Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The first-moment method for avoiding or forcing a finite count of bad events

Statement

Let X be a nonnegative integer-valued random variable on a finite probability space.

  1. If E[X]<1, some outcome has X=0.
  2. If E[X]>0, some outcome has X>0.
  3. More generally, some outcome satisfies XE[X] and some satisfies XE[X].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonnegative integer-valued random variable X on a finite probability space.

[L1]

Some outcome has value at least the expectation and some has value at most it (Expectation preserves pointwise order and lies between the minimum and maximum attained values).

[L2]

Markov gives P(X1)E[X] (Markov's inequality on a finite probability space).

[L3]

An event of positive probability in a finite probability space is nonempty (An event of positive probability in a finite probability space is nonempty).

[L4]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If E[X]<1, [L2] gives P(X1)<1, so [L4] gives P(X=0)>0 because a nonnegative integer is either zero or at least one.

L2L4algebra
1.2

If E[X]>0, an outcome with XE[X]>0 exists by [L1].

L1
2.1

By [L3], the event {X=0} is nonempty.

step 1.1L3
3.1

The two averaging assertions are exactly [L1]; steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove avoidance, and step 1.2 proves forcing.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1L1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 33 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources