Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First supplement: (−1/p)=(−1)(p−1)/2

Statement

For every odd prime p,

(−1p)=(−1)(p−1)/2.

Equivalently, (−1/p)=1 if and only if p≡1(mod4), while (−1/p)=−1 if and only if p≡3(mod4).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An odd prime p.

[L1]

Euler's criterion gives (a/p)≡a(p−1)/2(modp) for every integer a (Euler's criterion: (a/p)≡a(p−1)/2(modp)).

[L2]

Division by a positive integer has a unique quotient and remainder in the standard range (Division with remainder in Z: for a∈Z and b>0 there are unique q,r∈Z with a=qb+r and 0≤r<b).

[L3]
[L4]

For an odd prime p, (ap)=1 when p∤a and a is a quadratic residue modulo p, and (ap)=−1 when p∤a and a is a quadratic nonresidue modulo p (The Legendre symbol, including its zero value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L4givenalgebra

Substitute a=−1 in [L1]. An odd prime never divides −1, so [L4] gives (−1/p)∈{1,−1}, and (−1)(p−1)/2 is likewise 1 or −1; two such integers differ by at most 2<p, so their congruence modulo the odd prime p is equality: (−1/p)=(−1)(p−1)/2.

1.2L2algebra

By [L2], write p=4q+r with 0≤r<4. Since p is odd, r is 1 or 3. If r=1, then (p−1)/2=2q is even; if r=3, then (p−1)/2=2q+1 is odd.

2.1L3step 1.1step 1.2∎

By [L3], the two remainder cases in step 1.2 are exactly p≡1(mod4) and p≡3(mod4). Combining their parities with step 1.1 proves both biconditionals.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources