Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First supplement: (1/p)=(1)(p1)/2

Statement

For every odd prime p,

(1p)=(1)(p1)/2.

Equivalently, (1/p)=1 if and only if p1(mod4), while (1/p)=1 if and only if p3(mod4).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An odd prime p.

[L1]

Euler's criterion gives (a/p)a(p1)/2(modp) for every integer a (Euler's criterion: (a/p)a(p1)/2(modp)).

[L2]

Division by a positive integer has a unique quotient and remainder in the standard range (Division with remainder in Z: for aZ and b>0 there are unique q,rZ with a=qb+r and 0r<b).

[L3]
[L4]

For an odd prime p, (ap)=1 when pa and a is a quadratic residue modulo p, and (ap)=1 when pa and a is a quadratic nonresidue modulo p (The Legendre symbol, including its zero value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Substitute a=1 in [L1]. An odd prime never divides 1, so [L4] gives (1/p){1,1}, and (1)(p1)/2 is likewise 1 or 1; two such integers differ by at most 2<p, so their congruence modulo the odd prime p is equality: (1/p)=(1)(p1)/2.

L1L4givenalgebra
1.2

By [L2], write p=4q+r with 0r<4. Since p is odd, r is 1 or 3. If r=1, then (p1)/2=2q is even; if r=3, then (p1)/2=2q+1 is odd.

L2algebra
2.1

By [L3], the two remainder cases in step 1.2 are exactly p1(mod4) and p3(mod4). Combining their parities with step 1.1 proves both biconditionals.

L3step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 85 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources