Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Five term exact sequence of a first quadrant homological spectral sequence

Statement

Let Ep,qr be a homological spectral sequence in an abelian category, first quadrant from page 2, with specified finite abutment to Hn and increasing filtration normalized by F−1Hn=0, FnHn=Hn for n≥0. There is an exact sequence H2⟶E2,02→d2E0,12⟶H1⟶E1,02⟶0. The maps adjacent to homology are the edge maps. No initial injectivity of H2→E2,02 is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Homological spectral sequence gives degree (−r,r−1) and homology transitions.

[F2]

Edge homomorphisms of a first quadrant spectral sequence specifies the homological edge maps through normalized extreme filtration pieces.

[F3]

Spectral sequence subquotient and local lifting calculus gives canonical kernel, image and quotient comparisons.

Proof

Given: The sequence and normalized abutment in the statement. All page indices below satisfy r≥2; terms outside the first quadrant stay zero.

1.1F1F2

At (1,0) the outgoing target (1−r,r−1) and incoming source (1+r,1−r) are zero. Thus E1,02 is canonically E1,0∞=H1/F0H1, and the edge H1→E1,02 is the epic quotient map.

1.2F1F2F3

At (0,1) all outgoing targets (−r,r) vanish. Its incoming source is (r,2−r), which lies in the quadrant only for r=2. Therefore E0,1∞=coker⁡(d2:E2,02→E0,12), identified by abutment with F0H1/F−1H1=F0H1. The edge E0,12→H1 is the cokernel projection followed by the filtration inclusion.

1.3F1F2F3

At (2,0) all incoming sources (2+r,1−r) vanish. Its outgoing target (2−r,r−1) lies in the quadrant only at r=2. Hence E2,0∞=ker⁡d2, identified with F2H2/F1H2=H2/F1H2. The edge H2→E2,02 is the quotient onto that kernel followed by its monic inclusion.

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

Step 1.3 proves that the image at E2,02 is ker⁡d2. Step 1.2 proves that the next kernel at E0,12 is im⁡d2, and its image in H1 is F0H1. This is the kernel of the quotient in step 1.1, which is onto, proving exactness also at E1,02 before the terminal zero. These are precisely all claimed positions. There is no claim about a kernel at the initial H2 without a preceding map. Zero terms and zero d2 give the same kernel and cokernel factorizations; the degree-one normalized endpoints are used explicitly. All maps are canonical from the specified data, without splittings or AC.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources