How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The flowout theorem
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a smooth vector field on with maximal flow , and let be an embedded codimension-one submanifold. If for every , then there is an open neighbourhood of such that the map
is an embedding. Its image is a flowout of along .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a smooth vector field with maximal flow , and a codimension-one embedded submanifold everywhere transverse to .
The maximal flow is smooth on an open domain (The fundamental theorem on flows).
A codimension-one embedded submanifold has local defining functions (Local defining maps for embedded submanifolds).
Under , every indexed open cover of a smooth manifold admits a smooth partition of unity indexed by that cover and subordinate to it (Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds).
A map with invertible differential at a point is a local diffeomorphism near that point (The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds).
Proof
Fix . Because and has codimension one, one has . The map is smooth near by [L1], and its differential at sends the time direction to and the -directions identically onto . Hence is an isomorphism.
By [L4], for each there exist an open neighbourhood of , an open neighbourhood , and such that restricts to a diffeomorphism from onto its image in . By [L2], after shrinking choose a local defining function for . Since , change the sign of if needed and shrink so that on and . This is a pointwise existence argument; it does not select such data simultaneously for all .
For any local data from step 2.1 and , the integral curve satisfies . Since , the fundamental theorem of calculus gives for . Hence in that interval only when .
Let be the set of all pairs where is open, is a positive rational, , and for , implies . Steps 2.1–3.1 show that covers : each point has local data, and one can shrink its width to a positive rational. This canonical family of all admissible pairs requires no point-indexed selection. By [L3], take a locally finite subordinate partition and define . This is smooth and positive. At each , only finitely many are nonzero; choose among them with maximal . Then and because . Put and . This is an open neighbourhood of . If for two points of , interchange them so . The flow group law gives , while . The defining no-return property for forces , and then uniqueness gives . Thus is injective on .
Because has codimension one, the source and the target have the same dimension. The flow group law transports the invertible differential from in step 1.1 to every . Thus [L4] makes a local diffeomorphism throughout , and step 4.1 makes it injective. Hence is a diffeomorphism onto the open submanifold . By definition, this image is a flowout of along .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)