Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The flowout theorem

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let X be a smooth vector field on M with maximal flow Φ, and let S↪M be an embedded codimension-one submanifold. If Xp∉TpS for every p∈S, then there is an open neighbourhood O⊆R×S of {0}×S such that the map

F:O→M,F(t,p)=Φt(p),

is an embedding. Its image is a flowout of S along X.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a smooth vector field X with maximal flow Φ, and a codimension-one embedded submanifold S everywhere transverse to X.

[L1]

The maximal flow is smooth on an open domain (The fundamental theorem on flows).

[L2]

A codimension-one embedded submanifold has local defining functions (Local defining maps for embedded submanifolds).

[L3]

Under ACω, every indexed open cover of a smooth manifold admits a smooth partition of unity indexed by that cover and subordinate to it (Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds).

[L4]

A map with invertible differential at a point is a local diffeomorphism near that point (The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

Fix p∈S. Because Xp∉TpS and S has codimension one, one has TpM=RXp⊕TpS. The map F(t,q)=Φt(q) is smooth near (0,p) by [L1], and its differential at (0,p) sends the time direction to Xp and the S-directions identically onto TpS. Hence dF(0,p) is an isomorphism.

2.1L2L4step 1.1

By [L4], for each p∈S there exist an open neighbourhood W⊆S of p, an open neighbourhood U⊆M, and ε>0 such that F restricts to a diffeomorphism from (−ε,ε)×W onto its image in U. By [L2], after shrinking U choose a local defining function u:U→R for S∩U. Since Xp∉TpS=ker⁡(du)p, change the sign of u if needed and shrink U,W,ε so that X(u)≥c>0 on U and F((−ε,ε)×W)⊆U. This is a pointwise existence argument; it does not select such data simultaneously for all p.

3.1L1step 2.1

For any local data from step 2.1 and q∈W, the integral curve r↦F(r,q) satisfies ddru(F(r,q))=X(u)(F(r,q))≥c. Since u(q)=0, the fundamental theorem of calculus gives ∣u(F(t,q))∣≥c∣t∣ for ∣t∣<ε. Hence F(t,q)∈S in that interval only when t=0.

4.1L1L3step 3.1

Let I be the set of all pairs i=(Wi,εi) where Wi⊆S is open, εi is a positive rational, (−εi,εi)×Wi⊆D, and F(t,q)∈S for q∈Wi, ∣t∣<εi implies t=0. Steps 2.1–3.1 show that (Wi)i∈I covers S: each point has local data, and one can shrink its width to a positive rational. This canonical family of all admissible pairs requires no point-indexed selection. By [L3], take a locally finite subordinate partition (ρi)i∈I and define f(q)=∑i∈Iεiρi(q). This is smooth and positive. At each q, only finitely many ρi(q) are nonzero; choose among them i0 with maximal εi. Then q∈Wi0 and f(q)≤εi0 because ∑iρi(q)=1. Put δ=f/2 and O={(t,q)∈D:∣t∣<δ(q)}. This is an open neighbourhood of {0}×S. If F(t,q)=F(t′,q′) for two points of O, interchange them so f(q′)≤f(q). The flow group law gives F(t−t′,q)=q′∈S, while ∣t−t′∣<f(q)/2+f(q′)/2≤f(q)≤εi0. The defining no-return property for i0 forces t=t′, and then uniqueness gives q=q′. Thus F is injective on O.

5.1L4step 1.1step 4.1∎

Because S has codimension one, the source O⊆R×S and the target M have the same dimension. The flow group law transports the invertible differential from (0,q) in step 1.1 to every (t,q)∈O. Thus [L4] makes F a local diffeomorphism throughout O, and step 4.1 makes it injective. Hence F:O→M is a diffeomorphism onto the open submanifold F[O]. By definition, this image is a flowout of S along X.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources