How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Forward Euler heat CFL stability and sharp Nyquist instability
Statement
On a finite periodic rectangular -grid with , let . The forward-Euler heat update is nonexpansive in the periodic weighted grid L2 norm whenever . If every is even, the condition is sharp for that grid family: when , the joint Nyquist Fourier mode has amplification below and grows in norm under iteration. At equality its amplification is , so its magnitude is preserved.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite periodic rectangular -grid with spacings , diffusivities , time step , and the forward-Euler update from Fully discrete θ heat finite-difference scheme.
Periodic heat-stencil eigenvalues and θ amplification factor: every periodic Fourier mode has and forward-Euler multiplier ; the modes form a basis.
Proof
Since , [F1] gives for every mode. If , then , so .
The Fourier modes in [F1] are an orthogonal basis. Each mode is multiplied by a scalar of magnitude at most one in step 1.1; summing the squared modal coefficients therefore shows that one update is nonexpansive in the weighted grid norm, and every finite power remains nonexpansive.
If every is even, choose for every coordinate. Then each sine square in [F1] equals one, so and . It equals at and is strictly less than when . Repeated updates multiply this mode by , whose magnitude grows geometrically in the latter case.
Remarks
This Fourier result is for periodic grids. No finite-Dirichlet stability conclusion is inferred from it; the Dirichlet boundary rows are handled by the separate discrete maximum-principle and energy arguments. No choice axiom is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Endre Süli, B6.1 Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: A brief introduction to the theory of finite difference approximation of PDEs (standard reference, not scraped)
- Benjamin Seibold, MIT 18.336, Lecture 14: Von Neumann Stability Analysis (Spring 2009) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Martin Krosche, Hermann G. Matthies, and Oliver Kayser-Herold, Lecture Notes: Introduction to PDEs and Numerical Methods, Technical University Braunschweig, Revision 1.1 (2008), hosted by University of Jyväskylä (standard reference, not scraped)