Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fredholm index is additive

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X, Y and Z be Banach spaces over the same scalar field, and let T:XY and U:YZ be Fredholm operators (Fredholm operator cokernel and index, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces). Then UT:XZ is Fredholm and

ind(UT)=indU+indT.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

By Atkinson's theorem a bounded A is Fredholm exactly when there is a bounded B with ABI and BAI compact (Atkinson); the compact operators are closed under sums, scalar multiples and composition with bounded operators (Linear combinations of compact operators are compact, Compositions with a compact operator are compact, Fredholm operator cokernel and index).

[A2]

Rank-nullity: for a linear map f:VW with V finite dimensional, dimV=dimkerf+dimranf (Rank-nullity: dimFV=nullityT+rankT, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dimFV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis); and dimkerf=dimimg for an exact predecessor g at that spot, so that a finite exact sequence 0V1V2V3V4V5V60 of finite-dimensional spaces satisfies i=16(1)i+1dimVi=0 (Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, Linear subspace of a vector space).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC, Banach spaces X,Y,Z over one scalar field, Fredholm operators T:XY and U:YZ, and parametrices S for T and R for U as in [A1].

1.1

UT is Fredholm: SR is a parametrix for UT, since (SR)(UT)IX=S(RUIY)T+(STIX) and (UT)(SR)IZ=U(TSIY)R+(URIZ) are compact by [A1], so Atkinson gives Fredholmness of UT.

A1
1.2

The maps α:V1V2, α(x)=x; β:V2V3, β(x)=Tx; γ:V3V4, γ(y)=y+ranT; δ:V4V5, δ(y+ranT)=Uy+ran(UT); and ε:V5V6, ε(z+ran(UT))=z+ranU are well-defined linear maps: δ is well-defined because yranT gives Uyran(UT), and the other four are restrictions, inclusions or quotient maps of linear maps.

A3
2.1

All six spaces V1:=kerT, V2:=ker(UT), V3:=kerU, V4:=cokerT, V5:=coker(UT), V6:=cokerU are finite dimensional.

step 1.1A1
2.2

The sequence is exact at V1, V2 and V3: α is injective; kerβ={xV2:Tx=0}=V1=imα; and kerγ={yV3:yranT}={Tx:xV2}=imβ.

step 1.2
2.3

The sequence is exact at V4, V5 and V6: kerδ={y+ranT:Uyran(UT)}={y+ranT:yTxkerU for some x}=imγ; imδ={Uy+ran(UT):yY}={z+ran(UT):zranU}=kerε; and ε is surjective as the quotient map Z/ran(UT)Z/ranU.

step 1.2
3.1

Rank-nullity telescopes the dimensions: with f0:0V1, fi:ViVi+1 for 1i5 and f6:V60 the maps of [step 1.2], exactness gives kerfi=imfi1, so dimVi=dimimfi1+dimimfi, and summing with signs (+,,+,,+,) cancels to dimV1dimV2+dimV3dimV4+dimV5dimV6=0, because imf0=0 and imf6=0.

step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3A2
4.1

The index identity follows: ind(UT)=dimV2dimV5=(dimV1dimV4)+(dimV3dimV6)=indT+indU, by the telescoping identity of [step 3.1] and the definition of the index.

step 3.1A2A3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources