How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gelfand transform is a contractive unital homomorphism
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a nonzero commutative unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra) with Gelfand transform (Gelfand transform). Then:
- is a unital complex-algebra homomorphism: , and ;
- for every (Spectral radius), and consequently is contractive: .
No injectivity, surjectivity or *-preservation is claimed for a general commutative unital Banach algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, a nonzero commutative unital complex Banach algebra , its character space with the pointwise-evaluation topology, and .
Every character of satisfies and for all (Characters on a unital Banach algebra are continuous).
with , and each is continuous on by the definition of the evaluation topology (Gelfand transform).
, and every character satisfies (Spectrum as character values, Spectral radius, The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
For we have and for every , by [L1].
Each is a continuous complex-valued function on , since is the evaluation map and the evaluation topology makes all continuous; thus and it makes sense to speak of .
is complex-linear and multiplicative: for all , and , by linearity and multiplicativity of characters.
and for every , by [L3].
for every : the set of values equals by [step 1.4], and by [step 1.1] and [L1] the function is bounded with , so the supremum over of is the maximum of over , that is, ; in particular .
, the constant function one: for every by [step 1.1].
By [step 1.3], [step 2.1] and [step 2.2], is a unital algebra homomorphism with for all ; hence it is contractive.
Remarks
- The sup norm is finite. Boundedness of is not assumed: it follows from the norm bound of [L1], so the supremum in is taken over a bounded set of values.
- The formula is the exact quantitative content of the theorem; the inequality is the contractivity, and for a general Banach algebra it may be strict.
Depends on
Used by
- Commutative Gelfand Naimark Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Theorem 3.1.18, printed p. 62 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 5.63, printed pp. 262–266 (standard reference, not scraped)