How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Spectrum as character values
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a nonzero commutative unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra), let , and let be the spectrum of in (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra), with spectral radius (Spectral radius). Then
and consequently every character satisfies for every .
The spectrum is taken in the ambient algebra ; the statement is not a claim about the spectrum computed in a subalgebra, and no injectivity or surjectivity of the Gelfand transform is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, a nonzero commutative unital complex Banach algebra , and an element .
Every proper ideal of is contained in a maximal ideal, and the maximal ideals of are exactly the kernels of the characters of (Maximal ideals and characters of a commutative Banach algebra, The Axiom of Choice).
exactly when is not invertible in ; an element of a proper ideal is never invertible (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
Every character of is unital, so , and satisfies for all (Characters on a unital Banach algebra are continuous).
The spectral radius is and satisfies (Spectral radius, The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
For the element lies in , because by linearity and [L3]; as is a proper ideal, is not invertible, so by [L2].
If then the ideal generated by is proper: were , there would be with , making invertible, contrary to [L2].
By [L1] the proper ideal of [step 1.2] is contained in a maximal ideal , and for some character ; since we get , that is, by linearity and [L3].
Steps [step 1.1] and [step 2.1] give . For each character, , so by [L4], and by [L4]; the displayed consequence follows.
Remarks
-
AC is spent once, in the maximal-ideal extension. Both inclusions are otherwise algebraic: the forward inclusion only tests the character on a coset representative, and the reverse inclusion only extends an ideal.
-
Consequences for the Gelfand transform. Since , the equality of the statement says that the range of is exactly , which is how the norm formula is proved in Gelfand transform is a contractive unital homomorphism.
-
No isometry claim. The inequality chain is all that the spectrum identity yields; for a general commutative Banach algebra the first inequality can be strict, as
cex-gelfand-transform-of-a-banach-algebra-need-not-be-isometricrecords. -
Reading order. The example items named by ID above are homed on later pages of the plan, so they are named rather than hyperlinked: a body link to later material must be declared as a forward reference, and Step-5b closure removes every such declaration. Rehoming those items to an earlier page (an owner-only reading-order change) would make the citations backward and restore the links.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Corollary 3.1.8 and §3.1, printed pp. 54–61 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 5.63, printed pp. 262–266 (standard reference, not scraped)