How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independence of atlas, partition and refinement
Statement
Assume . The compact-support integral on an oriented manifold is independent of the chart cover, coordinate maps, subordinate partition, and refinement. If is open and contains , with its restricted orientation, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Integral of a compactly supported top form: Assume . For an oriented smooth manifold , possibly with boundary, and , choose a smooth partition subordinate to connected interior or boundary charts . For set Each product has compact support in its chart and only finitely many are nonzero, by lem-a-locally-finite-sum-is-finite-near-the-compact-support-of-a-form. For set has two orientations; define when is positive in the chosen orientation and when is positive. A zero-manifold is discrete; the singleton open cover of a compact subset has a finite subcover. Thus this sum too is finite. Empty support or empty gives zero. Independence of the choices is discharged by thm-global-form-integration-is-independent-of-the-atlas-partition-and-refinement.
Local finiteness near compact support: If is a locally finite family of closed subsets of a manifold and is compact, only finitely many meet . There is an open neighborhood of disjoint from all the other . In particular, for a smooth partition of unity and , only finitely many are nonzero.
Coordinate independence of chart integrals: Assume . On an oriented smooth -manifold, including and genuine boundary, a smooth top form with compact support contained in two connected charts has the same signed chart integral in both charts.
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Let and be two subordinate partitions. Near only finitely many indices from either family occur. Hence and are finite identities, including when is empty.
The support of is compact and contained in the intersection of its two chart domains. Its integral can therefore be computed in either chart with the same value. By linearity of chart integrals, the two original sums both equal . This also proves invariance under refinement.
For locality take the charts near inside and complete their cover by ; terms supported in the latter vanish. Equivalently the same product-partition argument compares a partition on to one on near . In dimension zero both sides are the same finite signed sum over , including individual points and empty sums.
Depends on
Used by
- Partition weights in two overlapping charts Example
- False: summing unweighted atlas integrals is valid False statement
- Linearity and additivity of the form integral Proposition
- Orientation reversal changes the integral sign Proposition
- Change of variables on oriented manifolds Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Integral of a compactly supported top form.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lee Proposition 16.5, pp.405–406; Merry Lemma 26.12 (standard reference, not scraped)