Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The global Wasserstein gradient flow exists uniquely and is stable

Statement

Assume AC and the full feature-measure energy hypotheses. Let μ0∈P2(Ω) have finite energy and be concentrated on Qr0. There is a unique global curve μ:[0,∞)→P2(Ω) in ACloc2 with μt=0=μ0 that solves the continuity equation with the negative minimum-norm subgradient velocity of the extended potential F′(μt)+ιΩ. For every finite T, the curve is concentrated on some Qr(T) and satisfies F(μt)−F(μs)=−∫st∫∣vq(u)∣2dμq(u)dq(0≤s≤t≤T). For any μ0,ν0∈P2(Ω) concentrated on the same Qr0, their flows obey sup⁡0≤t≤TW2(μt,νt)≤eKTTW2(μ0,ν0) for a finite constant KT depending only on T, r0, and a common upper bound for the initial energies. Consequently, W2-convergent initial laws in a common Qr0 have flows converging uniformly in W2 on every compact time interval.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the model hypotheses, μ0,ν0, and a finite time horizon T.

[F1]

Every localized flow exists uniquely, satisfies the continuity equation and energy identity, and has the localized stability estimate. The localized Wasserstein gradient flow exists, satisfies EVI, and is unique

[F2]

A finite-time radius can be chosen uniformly for initial laws in a fixed Qr0 with uniformly bounded initial energy; the cutoff equation agrees with the equation constrained only by Ω. The localized flow cannot escape all cutoffs in finite time

[F3]

AC supplies the local flows and their compatible path representatives. The Axiom of Choice

[F4]

Continuous prescribed forcing has unique global constrained characteristics, uniform cutoff bounds for starts in a common Qr, and finite-action PDE solutions are their pushforwards; the self-consistent localized laws obey W2 uniqueness. One-sided semiconvex characteristics give W2 uniqueness and stability

Proof

Given: AC, T, and initial laws as in the Statement.

1.1F1F2F3construct

Let E∗≥max⁡(F(μ0),F(ν0)) be a common energy bound. The escape estimate [F2] supplies a radius RT that works for both localized flows throughout [0,T]. By [F1], each localized flow exists on that interval and remains in a smaller Qr(T)⊂QRT, so the added cutoff normal cone is inactive and each curve solves the equation constrained by Ω. If S>T, the curves constructed with a larger radius agree on [0,T] by localized uniqueness [F1]; hence the finite-horizon curves patch to a well-defined global curve.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

The energy identity on [0,T] is inherited from [F1]. Applying the localized stability estimate on the common radius RT gives W2(μt,νt)≤eKTtW2(μ0,ν0) for 0≤t≤T, choosing KT to be the maximum of that localized exponent and 0; taking the supremum gives the displayed bound. Its right side tends to zero when the initial W2 distance does, proving compact-time uniform convergence. Since T was arbitrary, existence, uniqueness, energy dissipation, and stability hold globally in time.

3.1F1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

We check uniqueness against every curve in the stated definition, without presuming its energy decreases or its support stays in a cutoff. Choose q∈Q1. The neighborhood premise and derivative growth give ∥dΦx∥≤C(1+∣x∣) on Ω, after increasing C to absorb q. Segment integration yields ∥Φ(x)−Φ(y)∥≤C(1+∣x∣+∣y∣)∣x−y∣. Consequently every P2(Ω) law has a Bochner feature moment, and coupling Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∥mα−mβ∥≤C(1+(∫∣x∣2dα)1/2+(∫∣y∣2dβ)1/2)W2(α,β). The same growth argument for bounded potential supporting vectors shows V has at most quadratic growth. For a competing AC2 solution, second moments are uniformly bounded on [0,T] by the triangle inequality with δq, so its moment and forcing ∇R(mt) are continuous. The global fixed-forcing construction and superposition representation in [F4] therefore apply with D=Ω. Starting in Qr0, this competitor is concentrated throughout [0,T] on a single QS, using the uniform radius estimate of [F4] for its bounded forcing. Increase S slightly so the added cutoff constraint is locally inactive relative to Ω. Both the competitor and the constructed flow then solve the same localized model equation on a common larger cutoff, so the law uniqueness estimate in [F4] makes them equal. No energy bound on a previously unconfined competitor was assumed. This completes global uniqueness in the full stated class.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources