Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Compatible open pieces of ringed or locally ringed spaces glue

Statement

Let {(Xi,Oi)}iI be ringed spaces, or locally ringed spaces, together with open subsets UijXi and isomorphisms

φij:(Uij,OiUij)  (Uji,OjUji)

satisfying the usual identity and cocycle conditions on triple overlaps. Then these data glue to a ringed space, respectively a locally ringed space, covered by open subsets identified with the Xi.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Compatible gluing data of ringed spaces or locally ringed spaces.

[F1]

A ringed space is a topological space with a sheaf of rings, and a locally ringed space is one whose stalks are local rings (A ringed space, A locally ringed space).

[F2]

Morphisms of locally ringed spaces are morphisms of ringed spaces whose stalk maps are local (Morphisms of locally ringed spaces).

[L1]

Compatible local sheaves glue uniquely up to unique isomorphism (Compatible local sheaves glue uniquely up to unique isomorphism).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Form the disjoint union iXi and impose the equivalence relation generated by xiφij(xi) whenever xiUij, using the underlying homeomorphisms of the isomorphisms φij. The identity and cocycle hypotheses make this an equivalence relation. Let X be the quotient space. The image Vi of each Xi in X is open, the Vi cover X, and the quotient map qi:XiVi is a homeomorphism because identifications occur only along open subsets via homeomorphisms.

givenconstruct
2.1

Transport each structure sheaf Oi to the open subset Vi via qi, obtaining a sheaf of rings on Vi. The ringed-space isomorphisms on the overlaps induce isomorphisms of these sheaves on ViVj, and the cocycle condition is exactly the compatibility required by [L1]. Hence [L1] glues the local structure sheaves to a sheaf of rings OX on X, making each qi an isomorphism of ringed spaces (Xi,Oi)(Vi,OXVi).

F1L1step 1.1construct
3.1

If the input pieces are locally ringed spaces, let xX and choose i with xVi. Because qi is a homeomorphism onto an open neighbourhood of x, the stalk OX,x identifies with the stalk of Oi at the corresponding point of Xi. That stalk is local by [F1], so every stalk of OX is local. Thus (X,OX) is locally ringed.

F1step 2.1
4.1

Any other glued ringed or locally ringed space has the same quotient-topology description as in step 1.1 and the same locally compatible structure sheaf. By the uniqueness clause of [L1], it is uniquely isomorphic to (X,OX). This proves existence and uniqueness in both the ringed and locally ringed settings.

F2L1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources