How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite integral cohomological dimension implies torsion-free
Statement
If , then is torsion-free.
Proof
Given: A finite projective resolution of the trivial -module.
If has finite order , restrict the resolution to ; subgroup freeness preserves projectives, so .
In , the alternating maps and form a periodic free resolution: , and coefficient comparison gives the two kernels as the two images. With trivial coefficients , its Hom complex has zero differentials, so for arbitrarily large . This contradicts finite cohomological dimension.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Löh, Corollary 1.7.3 (standard reference, not scraped)