Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hausdorff measure is Borel regular

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For every subset A of a metric space and every finite s0 there is a Borel set GA with Hs(G)=Hs(A). Consequently

Hs(A)=inf{Hs(B):AB, B Borel},

so this is also the outer measure induced by the Borel restriction. In Euclidean spaces G may be chosen Gδ. This regularity assertion does not assert local finiteness.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, conventions, and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

Under Countable Choice, Hausdorff measure is a metric outer measure and measures Borel sets. Hausdorff measure is metric and measures every Borel set

[F2]

Under the standing Countable Choice hypothesis, H0 counts finite sets and is infinite on infinite sets. Zero-dimensional Hausdorff measure is counting measure

[F3]

Countable Choice allows a sequence of choices from nonempty families. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

Proof

1.1

If Hs(A)=, take G=X. If A=, take G=. If s=0 and the measure is finite, A is finite, hence closed and Borel. In Euclidean space a finite set is a Gδ, by intersecting its open 1/k-neighbourhoods.

F1F2
1.2

In the remaining case s>0 and M=Hs(A)<, choose for each k1 a 2k-cover (Ukj) of cost at most M+2k. Replacing each set by its closure preserves diameter: approximate two closure points by original points and use the triangle inequality. Set G=kjUkj. This is Borel and contains A.

F3given
2.1

For fixed δ>0 and all sufficiently large k, the kth closed cover also covers G at scale δ. Hence Hδs(G)M+2k, so Hδs(G)M. Take the supremum over δ and use monotonicity to get equality. Infimising Borel-superset measures gives the displayed identity: every such value is at least Hs(A) and this G attains it.

F1step 1.2
3.1

For Euclidean X in the finite positive-exponent case, enlarge Ukj to the open neighbourhood Vkj={x:d(x,Ukj)<ηkj} with 0<ηkj<2k2 and (diamUkj+2ηkj)s(diamUkj)s+2kj1. Continuity of the positive power at every nonnegative finite base supplies these choices, including singleton sets. Then G=kjVkj is Gδ, each covering diameter is at most 21k, and each cost is at most M+21k. The same fixed-scale argument proves equality.

F3step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources