How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hausdorff measure is Borel regular
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For every subset of a metric space and every finite there is a Borel set with . Consequently
so this is also the outer measure induced by the Borel restriction. In Euclidean spaces may be chosen . This regularity assertion does not assert local finiteness.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, conventions, and hypotheses in the statement above.
Under Countable Choice, Hausdorff measure is a metric outer measure and measures Borel sets. Hausdorff measure is metric and measures every Borel set
Under the standing Countable Choice hypothesis, counts finite sets and is infinite on infinite sets. Zero-dimensional Hausdorff measure is counting measure
Countable Choice allows a sequence of choices from nonempty families. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Proof
If , take . If , take . If and the measure is finite, is finite, hence closed and Borel. In Euclidean space a finite set is a , by intersecting its open -neighbourhoods.
In the remaining case and , choose for each a -cover of cost at most . Replacing each set by its closure preserves diameter: approximate two closure points by original points and use the triangle inequality. Set . This is Borel and contains .
For fixed and all sufficiently large , the th closed cover also covers at scale . Hence , so . Take the supremum over and use monotonicity to get equality. Infimising Borel-superset measures gives the displayed identity: every such value is at least and this attains it.
For Euclidean in the finite positive-exponent case, enlarge to the open neighbourhood with and . Continuity of the positive power at every nonnegative finite base supplies these choices, including singleton sets. Then is , each covering diameter is at most , and each cost is at most . The same fixed-scale argument proves equality.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Fremlin, Measure Theory, 264F(a,b),264K,264Xd,264Ye (standard reference, not scraped)
- Falconer, The Geometry of Fractal Sets, Theorem 1.6(a) (standard reference, not scraped)