How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A sufficient monotonicity square for cubic Hermite interpolation
Statement
Let be the single Hermite piece from Piecewise cubic Hermite interpolant on , with , endpoint values , slopes , and secant . If and , both lie in , then is monotone from to and stays between those values. If and , then is constant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: One Hermite cell with , endpoint values and slopes as in the statement.
Piecewise cubic Hermite interpolant: the cell is for .
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with : continuity on a closed interval and differentiability in its interior give for some interior whenever .
Sum, product, quotient, and chain rules from difference quotients: the integer power rule holds for .
Proof
For , differentiating [F1] by [F3], using and , gives . Indeed, , , and ; substitution produces those coefficients. Direct substitution in [F1] also gives and .
For put , , , and . These are nonnegative and sum to one. The polynomial in step 1.1 is affine in , so it equals the convex combination with these weights of its values at , namely , , , and . Each of these four polynomials is nonnegative on .
step 2.1 gives throughout the cell. If , ; if , . For any two points in the cell, [F2] transfers that derivative sign to , so is monotone; step 1.1 gives its endpoint values , so every value lies between them. If , then and [F1] reduces to , since and .
Remarks
The diagram uses horizontal coordinate and vertical coordinate ; the shaded square is the sufficient region . Its four vertices are the four derivative polynomials listed in proof step 2.1. The argument above proves the claim independently of the picture.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.