Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sum, product, quotient, and chain rules from difference quotients

Statement

Every function differentiable at c is continuous at c. If f,g are real functions differentiable at c, then f+g and fg are differentiable there and

(f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c),(fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c).

If g(c)≠0, then f/g is differentiable at c and

(f/g)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c)g(c)2.

If f is differentiable at c, g is differentiable at f(c), and the composition is defined near c, then g∘f is differentiable at c and (g∘f)′(c)=g′(f(c))f′(c). For every integer m≥1, (xm)′=mxm−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Differentiability by the difference-quotient definition in Continuity and derivative on a real interval and the real modulus rules Real and complex modulus product and triangle inequalities.

[F1]

Continuity and derivative on a real interval: f′(c) is the finite limit of (f(c+h)−f(c))/h as h→0, h≠0.

[L1]

Real and complex modulus product and triangle inequalities: ∣xy∣=∣x∣∣y∣ for real x,y.

Proof

1.1F1L1algebra

If f is differentiable at c, write f(c+h)−f(c)=hq(h), where q(h)→f′(c). Then q is bounded for sufficiently small h, so ∣f(c+h)−f(c)∣≤∣h∣∣q(h)∣→0. Thus f is continuous at c.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

The sum difference quotient is the sum of the two difference quotients, so it tends to f′(c)+g′(c). For the product, use f(c+h)g(c+h)−f(c)g(c)h=f(c+h)g(c+h)−g(c)h+g(c)f(c+h)−f(c)h. By step 1.1, f(c+h)→f(c); taking limits gives the product rule.

2.2F1step 1.1algebra

By step 1.1, g is continuous at c. Since g(c)≠0, g(c+h)≠0 for sufficiently small h. Algebra gives f(c+h)/g(c+h)−f(c)/g(c)h=g(c)(f(c+h)−f(c))/h−f(c)(g(c+h)−g(c))/hg(c+h)g(c). The denominator tends to g(c)2≠0 and the numerator tends to g(c)f′(c)−f(c)g′(c), proving the quotient rule.

2.3F1step 1.1L1algebra

Put y=f(c) and Δ(h)=f(c+h)−y. Step 1.1 gives Δ(h)→0, and [F1] gives Δ(h)/h→f′(c). Differentiability of g at y means g(y+u)−g(y)=g′(y)u+uϵ(u) for u≠0, where ϵ(u)→0; set ϵ(0)=0. Then g(f(c+h))−g(f(c))h=g′(y)Δ(h)h+ϵ(Δ(h))Δ(h)h. The first term tends to g′(y)f′(c); the second tends to zero because ϵ(Δ(h))→0 and Δ(h)/h is bounded. This proves the chain rule, including increments with Δ(h)=0.

3.1step 2.1algebrainduction∎

The case m=1 is the derivative of the identity function, whose quotient is exactly 1. Suppose (xm)′=mxm−1. Since xm+1=x⋅xm, the product rule in step 2.1 gives (xm+1)′=xm+x(mxm−1)=(m+1)xm. Induction proves the power rule for all m≥1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources