Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Signed finite remainder for the erfcx asymptotic expansion

Statement

For real x>0 and integer N≥1, put

(1/2)0=1,(1/2)k=∏j=0k−1(j+1/2).

SN(x)=1xπ∑k=0N−1(−1)k(1/2)kx2k.

Then

erfcx⁡(x)−SN(x)=(−1)NRN(x),0≤RN(x)≤1xπ(2N)!4NN!x2N.

This is a finite signed remainder bound, not a convergence assertion for the asymptotic series.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: x>0, integer N≥1, and the definitions of erfcx and Mk(x) in Scaled complementary error function and its moments.

[F1]

Moment recurrence for the scaled complementary error function: erfcx⁡(x)=2M0(x)/π.

[F2]

Change of variable in an improper integral: a valid increasing C1 substitution preserves convergence and value of an improper integral.

[F3]

Taylor's Lagrange remainder follows from repeated Rolle steps: the Taylor remainder after degree N−1 of a CN function is f(N)(ξ)tN/N! for some ξ between the expansion point and t.

[F4]

Gamma at the positive integers: Γ(N+1)=N! for integer N≥0.

[F5]

Euler's Gamma function on the right half-plane and Euler's Gamma integral converges locally uniformly on the right half-plane: for a>0, Γ(a)=∫0∞sa−1e−s ds<∞.

[L9]

Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, Sum, product, quotient, and chain rules from difference quotients: the displayed real functions are smooth on their stated domains, and their derivatives follow by the product, power and chain rules; iterate these rules for the finite higher derivatives used below.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

In the integral for M0, set s=t2+2xt. Its derivative 2(t+x)>0 for t≥0, so [F2] applies. Then ds=2(t+x)dt, t+x=x2+s, and erfcx⁡(x)=1π∫0∞e−sx2+s ds=1xπ∫0∞e−s(1+sx2)−1/2ds.

1.2F3L9algebra

Direct differentiation gives f(N)(u)=(−1)N(1/2)N(1+u)−N−1/2. Apply [F3] to f(t)=(1+t)−1/2 at 0 to obtain f(t)=∑k=0N−1(−1)k(1/2)kk!tk+(−1)NρN(t),0≤ρN(t)≤(1/2)NN!tN(t≥0), because ∣f(N)(u)∣=(1/2)N(1+u)−N−1/2≤(1/2)N for u≥0.

2.1F4F5step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Substitute t=s/x2 in step 1.2 and integrate against e−s/(xπ). By the Gamma integral and [F4], ∫0∞e−ssNds=Γ(N+1)=N! by [F5] and [F4]. The signed remainder is nonnegative after removing (−1)N and is at most (1/2)N/(x2N+1π). The identity (1/2)N=(2N)!/(4NN!) follows by separating even and odd factors in (2N)!. This gives the stated bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources