How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Adjacent initial Bessel values cannot both vanish
Statement
For every real , and are not both zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real number and the integer-order Bessel functions from Integer-order Bessel series.
Bessel differential equations and order recurrences from the series: is entire, satisfies , has , and .
Identity theorem for holomorphic functions: two holomorphic functions on a complex domain that agree on a set with an interior accumulation point agree throughout that domain.
Proof
Suppose . By [F1], . Expand the entire function about , . The coefficient of in the differential equation in [F1] is with . Since and , induction gives for all , so vanishes on a disk about .
Apply [F2] to and the zero function on the connected domain . It follows that is identically zero, contradicting from [F1]. Thus and cannot both vanish.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- DLMF, §§10.2(i)–(ii) (standard reference, not scraped)
- N. M. Temme, “Numerical aspects of special functions,” Acta Numerica 17 (2008), §§2 and 4 (standard reference, not scraped)