How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gamma at the positive integers
Statement
For every integer ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonnegative integer .
On the right half-plane, (The Gamma functional equation).
Proof
Directly from the defining integral, .
Repeatedly applying [L1] gives .
Depends on
Used by
- B(1/2,1/2)=π Example
- Stirling's approximation for 10! Example
- FALSE: the Gamma recurrence and factorial values characterize Gamma False statement
- Meromorphic continuation of Gamma Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Chandrasekharan, Lectures on the Riemann Zeta-Function, Lecture 6 §1(iv) (standard reference, not scraped)