Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Real and complex modulus product and triangle inequalities

Statement

For real x,y, ∣xy∣=∣x∣∣y∣ and ∣x+y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣. For complex z,w, ∣zw∣=∣z∣∣w∣, ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣, and if w≠0 then ∣z/w∣=∣z∣/∣w∣.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

Dedekind-complete ordered real field: real absolute value is ∣x∣=x for x≥0 and ∣x∣=−x for x<0.

[L2]

Real intervals, complex rectangles and ball enclosures: for z=x+iy, ∣z∣=x2+y2; for z≠0, 1/z=(x−iy)/(x2+y2).

[L3]

Nonnegative real square roots exist uniquely: the square root is the unique nonnegative root of each nonnegative input.

Proof

1.1givenL1algebra

By [L1], −∣x∣≤x≤∣x∣ and −∣y∣≤y≤∣y∣. Adding gives −(∣x∣+∣y∣)≤x+y≤∣x∣+∣y∣, hence ∣x+y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣. The product identity follows by considering the four sign choices for x and y in the piecewise definition [L1].

1.2givenL2L3algebra

For z=x+iy and w=u+iv, expansion gives ∣zw∣2=(xu−yv)2+(xv+yu)2=(x2+y2)(u2+v2)=∣z∣2∣w∣2. Both moduli are nonnegative by [L2], so uniqueness of nonnegative square roots [L3] gives ∣zw∣=∣z∣∣w∣. Also, if 0≤a≤b and r=a, s=b, then r,s≥0. If r>s, then a−b=r2−s2=(r−s)(r+s)>0, a contradiction. Thus the square-root map is increasing on nonnegative inputs.

2.1step 1.2L2L3algebra∎

The identity (x2+y2)(u2+v2)−(xu+yv)2=(xv−yu)2≥0. Thus (xu+yv)2≤∣z∣2∣w∣2. The increasing property proved in step 1.2 gives ∣xu+yv∣≤∣z∣∣w∣, hence xu+yv≤∣z∣∣w∣. Thus ∣z+w∣2=∣z∣2+∣w∣2+2(xu+yv)≤(∣z∣+∣w∣)2; applying the same increasing property gives ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣. By the reciprocal formula in [L2], w(1/w)=(u+iv)(u−iv)/(u2+v2)=1. Step 1.2 gives ∣w∣∣1/w∣=∣1∣=1. Here ∣w∣>0: otherwise u2+v2=0 forces u=v=0 because each square is nonnegative, contrary to w≠0. Hence ∣1/w∣=1/∣w∣, and another application of step 1.2 yields ∣z/w∣=∣z∣/∣w∣.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

3 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources