How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The unique irreducible quotient of an affine Hecke standard module
Statement
Let be a Langlands datum for the complex affine Hecke algebra of any reduced based root datum with positive real parameters, as in Weight temperedness and positive Langlands data, and let be its real exponent. Then has a unique maximal proper submodule and therefore a unique irreducible quotient .
With as in Dominant projection and strict parabolic weight decrease, the largest value of among the weights of or is . The sum of the generalized weight spaces attaining that value is canonically the injected copy of as an -module. Every such weight satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Langlands datum , exponent , and .
All logarithmic weights of lie in and is irreducible (Weight temperedness and positive Langlands data).
For these weights the dominant projection is and its norm strictly decreases after every (Dominant projection and strict parabolic weight decrease).
Induction is finite dimensional, injects as , and has multiset of weights . Generalized weight spaces are exact in invariant-subspace sequences (Parabolic induction, central orbit blocks and weight filtrations).
Proof
Given: These data. Write and .
By [F1], [F2] and [F3], all weights of have -value and projection , whereas every weight contributed by a nonidentity coset has strictly smaller -value. The -stable quotient has exactly those smaller weights by the induction filtration and weight-space exactness. It follows that the sum of all generalized weight spaces in with -value is exactly : the inclusion holds by its weights, and the quotient has none of these weights. In particular is an irreducible -submodule.
If an -submodule contains a nonzero vector of a generalized weight space with -value , then . This intersection is -stable, so irreducibility gives . The induced module is generated by under , whence . Consequently every proper -submodule has all its weights of -value strictly below , and is contained in the sum of the lower generalized weight spaces as a vector subspace. The sum of all proper submodules is therefore contained in that same lower-weight subspace, is proper, and contains every proper submodule. Finite dimensionality ensures this sum is an ordinary finite sum of subspaces after a basis is selected. Thus is the unique maximal proper submodule and is irreducible.
Since has no top weights, exactness of generalized weight spaces identifies the top subspace of with , including its -action. It is nonzero, its projection vector is , and every remaining weight has smaller -value. Any irreducible quotient has a maximal kernel, necessarily , proving uniqueness and all the claimed intrinsic top-space properties.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maarten Solleveld, On the classification of irreducible representations of affine Hecke algebras with unequal parameters (standard reference, not scraped)