How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The hook length formula
Statement
For every and every , the number of standard -tableaux is the empty product for being , so that and, for , for and . In particular, over , for the Specht module , including .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and a partition , with the number of standard -tableaux and the hook product.
for , and ; the boxes of are the boxes of together with for (The removal recursion for standard tableaux).
For with : (Removing a corner changes hooks in its row and column).
, the empty sum being (The hook-product ratios sum to the size).
The family of standard polytabloids is a -basis of the Specht module , so for every , including (Standard polytabloids form a basis of a complex Specht module).
is the product of the positive integers , one for each box of ; for it is the empty product , for the product is , and for the conjugate diagram gives the same multiset of hooks (Hook, arm, leg, and hook length of a box).
Proof
Base cases: for the only partition is , whose set of standard tableaux is the singleton consisting of the empty tableau, so with empty product ; for the only partition is , whose single box has and exactly one standard tableau, so .
Induction hypothesis: for every with and every partition , .
The dimension clause: by [F4], for every , including where both sides are ; this holds for all because [F4] covers every .
For and , [F1] gives ; each is a partition of , so step 1.2 gives , and [F2] turns this into . Summing over the removable nodes and using [F3], .
The two identities follow because the hook multiset of and of is by [F5], so the formula gives in both cases.
Strong induction on : the base cases are step 1.1, the inductive step is step 2.1 with the hypothesis step 1.2, and steps 1.3 and 3.1 record the dimension and endpoint clauses; hence and hold for every and every .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David A. Craven, Groups, Geometries and Representation Theory (Spring Term 2013 lecture notes, 42 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Charlotte Chan, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups (Oxford Hilary Term 2011 lecture notes, 40 PDF pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, MIT 18.712 Chapter 4 (OCW Chapter 4 file, 32 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)