How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hyperbolicity of a finitely generated group is independent of the finite generating set
Statement
Let be a finitely generated group. If the Cayley graph of is hyperbolic for one finite generating set, then it is hyperbolic for every finite generating set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finitely generated group and two finite generating sets .
Two finite generating sets of a group give bilipschitz equivalent word metrics (The identity map between the word metrics of two finite generating sets is a bilipschitz equivalence).
Hyperbolicity is a quasi-isometry invariant of geodesic spaces (Hyperbolicity is a quasi-isometry invariant of geodesic spaces).
Proof
By [L1], the identity map on is a quasi-isometry between the two Cayley graphs and .
Therefore [L2] transfers hyperbolicity from one Cayley graph to the other. So the definition of a hyperbolic group does not depend on the chosen finite generating set.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Clara Löh, Geometric Group Theory, Section 6.3 (standard reference, not scraped)