How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A -uniform hypergraph is -colourable when every edge meets at most other edges and
Statement
Let and . Suppose every edge of a finite -uniform hypergraph meets at most other edges and Then the hypergraph is two-colourable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite -uniform hypergraph satisfying the Statement.
A -uniform edge contains exactly vertices (-uniform hypergraphs and complete balanced -partite -graphs ).
Product weights factor coordinatewise, and finite Fubini factors sums over disjoint coordinate blocks (The finite product of finite probability spaces, Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule).
A dependency graph requires each bad event to be independent of every conjunction of complements indexed by its non-neighbours (Dependency digraphs for a finite family of bad events).
If bad events have probability at most , a dependency graph of maximum degree , and , then they can all be avoided with positive probability (The symmetric Lovász Local Lemma under ).
An event of positive probability in a finite probability space is nonempty (An event of positive probability in a finite probability space is nonempty).
For every real , ; in particular ( for every real , hence ).
Proof
Colour vertices independently and fairly. For each edge , let be the event that is monochromatic. The two monochromatic assignments are disjoint and each has product weight , so .
Join two bad events when their edges meet. If all edges indexing a complement conjunction are disjoint from , that conjunction depends only on coordinates outside ; finite Fubini in [L2] factors its intersection probability with . Thus [L3] makes the edge-intersection graph a dependency graph, and its degree is at most .
The numerical hypothesis is , so [L4] gives positive probability that no edge is monochromatic.
By [L5], the positive-probability event in step 2.1 contains a colouring, and that colouring is proper. For , [L6] gives , so the numerical hypothesis cannot hold; the empty-edge case for admissible parameters is immediate.
Depends on
- $r$-uniform hypergraphs and complete balanced $r$-partite $r$-graphs $K^{(r)}_{s,\ldots,s}$
- The finite product of finite probability spaces
- Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule
- Dependency digraphs for a finite family of bad events
- $1+x\le\exp(x)$ for every real $x$, hence $(1-p)^m\le\exp(-mp)$
- The symmetric Lovász Local Lemma under $ep(d+1)\le1$
- An event of positive probability in a finite probability space is nonempty
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 111 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Matousek and J. Vondrak, The Probabilistic Method, Section 5.2 (standard reference, not scraped)