How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In a spherical category the left and right traces agree
Statement
Let be a spherical tensor category over an algebraically closed field , with spherical structure . For every object and every endomorphism ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A spherical tensor category over an algebraically closed field , an object , and an endomorphism .
Spherical means for every object (Spherical structure). The pivotal comparison is a monoidal natural isomorphism (Pivotal structure).
Traces are the composites of The categorical trace of a morphism into the double dual. They are additive on direct sums and satisfy duality and cyclicity, including the different-object mate calculation in its proof (Basic properties of the categorical trace).
A tensor category is locally finite, -linear abelian with bilinear tensor product and ; in particular objects have finite length and endomorphism spaces have finite dimension (Tensor and multitensor categories).
Proof
Two cyclic linear functionals. Put and . Bilinearity of tensor product makes these -linear. If and , generalized cyclicity in [L2] and give ; the mirrored mate calculation gives . Both functionals are additive under finite direct sums. Naturality of at evaluation, together with monoidality, says that is the inverse of : after inserting either into evaluation the same pairing results, and uniqueness of mates identifies them. The dual-trace identity in [L2], applied on , therefore gives .
Nilpotents have zero trace. We prove simultaneously that for any nilpotent endomorphism by induction on the finite length of . The zero object and give zero by linearity. Otherwise factor through its image , with and . Since is nilpotent and , its image is a proper subobject of : otherwise would be epic and a power would be both zero and epic. Thus has smaller length than . The endomorphism of is nilpotent, because for a sufficiently large . Step 1.1 gives and by induction.
Primary summands. Finite-dimensionality of gives a nonzero polynomial annihilating . Since is algebraically closed, it factors into powers of the distinct linear factors . The Chinese remainder identity for these pairwise coprime factors supplies mutually orthogonal polynomial idempotents summing to and with . Idempotents split in an abelian category: , since the sum of their inclusion/projection pairs is the identity. On the summand , write with nilpotent. Additivity, linearity and step 2.1 give and . Step 1.1 equates each pair of summands, proving the displayed identity.
Remarks
The algebraically closed ground-field hypothesis is essential for the dimension-based definition of spherical structure used here. Over , take finite-dimensional real representations of the cyclic group of order three and let the pivotal comparison be the canonical double-dual map followed by the central generator . Every real representation has the same character at and , so its two pivotal dimensions agree. On the two-dimensional rotation representation, however, has left pivotal trace and right pivotal trace . Definitions of spherical category that require equality of traces of all endomorphisms over arbitrary fields use a stronger defining condition.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Theorem 4.7.15 (standard reference, not scraped)