How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The compact binding target exists and has a unique lexicographic tie-break
Statement
Let be the nonempty compact parameter set of Binding function and indirect-inference target, and fix an admissible for which its objective is continuous. Then is a nonempty compact set and has a unique lexicographically least element. Thus the target selector specified in Binding function and indirect-inference target exists.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty compact metric space with its Euclidean metric, and a continuous real-valued objective .
The binding-target definition specifies a nonempty compact with its Euclidean subspace metric, continuity of , and lexicographic coordinate tie-breaking. Binding function and indirect-inference target
A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space attains its minimum. A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
A closed subset of a compact metric space is compact. A closed subset of a compact metric space is compact
Continuity at means that for every there is such that implies . Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the - form
The compactness hypothesis is open-cover compactness in the induced metric; the Euclidean distance is a metric. Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
Proof
By [F2], attains a minimum on . Hence is nonempty.
The set is closed in . Indeed, if , then ; take . By [F4], some makes imply , and therefore . This ball misses , so every point of its complement has a neighborhood in that complement.
By [F3], is compact.
Set . For , suppose is nonempty compact. The coordinate map is continuous because . By [F2], it attains a minimum on . Define ; this set is nonempty. It is closed in : for , a ball of radius around misses by the same coordinate inequality. Hence [F3] makes compact. Finite induction constructs nonempty compact .
The nonempty set contains a vector whose th coordinate is for each , so it contains at most one vector and is a singleton. For any , take the first coordinate at which , if one exists. Then and the definition of gives . Thus the unique element of is lexicographically no larger than every member of , and is the unique lexicographically least minimizer.
Depends on
- Binding function and indirect-inference target
- A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
- A closed subset of a compact metric space is compact
- Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space
- Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ form
- Metric space: $d(x,y) = 0$ iff $x = y$, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Binding function and indirect-inference target.
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christian Gouriéroux, Alain Monfort, and Eric Renault, Indirect Inference, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8, Supplement, S85–S118 (1993) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas J. Sargent and John Stachurski, Intermediate Quantitative Economics with Python, Chapter 38: Which Moments to Match? (standard reference, not scraped)