Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An inexact gradient residual certifies distance under strong convexity

Statement

Let U⊆Rd be open and convex, let f∈C2(U,R) have an attained interior global minimizer x∗, and suppose Hf(x)⪰μI on U for some μ>0. For a candidate x~∈U, let g^∈Rd be a computed gradient vector. If independently verified bounds

∥g^∥2≤η,∥g^−∇f(x~)∥2≤δ

hold for η,δ≥0, then

∥x~−x∗∥2≤η+δμ.

The residual η and discrepancy δ are mathematical hypotheses. A software stopping flag alone establishes neither bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses of the Statement.

[F1]

A Hessian lower bound gives strong convexity and gradient-gap bounds: a Hessian lower bound yields ⟨∇f(x)−∇f(y),x−y⟩≥μ∥x−y∥22 for all x,y∈U and an interior minimizer has zero gradient.

[F2]
[F3]

Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation: ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥2∥v∥2 and ∥u+v∥2≤∥u∥2+∥v∥2.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3given

Apply [F1] with x=x~ and y=x∗. Since ∇f(x∗)=0, it gives μ∥x~−x∗∥22≤⟨∇f(x~),x~−x∗⟩≤∥∇f(x~)∥2∥x~−x∗∥2 by [F3]. If x~=x∗ the result is immediate; otherwise divide by the positive distance to obtain μ∥x~−x∗∥2≤∥∇f(x~)∥2.

2.1F3step 1.1givenalgebra∎

The triangle inequality in [F3] and the two verified bounds give ∥∇f(x~)∥2≤∥g^∥2+∥∇f(x~)−g^∥2≤η+δ. Combine with step 1.1 and divide by μ>0.

Remarks

The certificate combines two distinct checks: a residual of the computed vector and an error bound comparing that vector with the true gradient. If δ=0, it reduces to the exact-gradient certificate; if the objective is computed by quadrature or another inner method, its gradient error must still be bounded separately.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources