Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Damped Newton reaches its local quadratic phase in finitely many continued updates

Statement

Let d≥1 and U⊆Rd be open and convex, let f∈C2(U,R) have an attained global minimum f∗=f(x∗) at x∗∈U, and fix x0∈U. Suppose K:={y∈U:f(y)≤f(x0)} is compact and is contained in a convex open V⊆U that contains every Newton backtracking trial segment under consideration. For constants 0<m≤M, assume

m∥v∥22≤vTHf(y)v≤M∥v∥22(y∈V, v∈Rd).

Assume also that there are R>0 and LH≥0 with B(x∗,R)⊆V and ∥Hf(y)−Hf(z)∥op≤LH∥y−z∥2 for y,z∈B(x∗,R), where ∥A∥op:=sup⁡∥v∥2=1∥Av∥2. Run Damped Newton method with a∈(0,1/2), b∈(0,1), and positive decrement tolerance ε. Let ρ>0 and C<∞ be constants furnished by Newton's method has local quadratic convergence under a Lipschitz Hessian for these data, and set

τN:=min⁡{1,2b(1−a)mM},qN:=1−2amτNM.

For every accepted update before entry into B(x∗,ρ),

f(xk+1)−f∗≤qN(f(xk)−f∗),0<qN<1.

Thus, after finitely many such updates the method either has stopped at its positive decrement test or has entered B(x∗,ρ). More explicitly, if ε<m2ρ2/(2M), the decrement test cannot stop outside that ball, so the method reaches it after finitely many accepted updates. Once in this ball, every later attempted update has step tk=1 and satisfies

∥xk+1−x∗∥2≤C∥xk−x∗∥22.

The last assertion is conditional on the decrement test not stopping first. No post-stop iterate or update is asserted. This is a strongly convex objective result; it does not apply to arbitrary vector roots or indefinite Hessians.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses of the Statement, a generated iterate x∈K, and the canonical damped-Newton line-search parameters and decrement test.

[F1]

Damped Newton method: when Hf(x) is positive definite it computes p=−Hf(x)−1∇f(x) and λ2=∇f(x)THf(x)−1∇f(x); if λ2/2≤ε it stops before line search, and otherwise it backtracks from t=1 using the Armijo condition with parameter a and factor b.

[F2]

Newton's method has local quadratic convergence under a Lipschitz Hessian: for a C2 objective with a positive-definite critical Hessian and a Lipschitz Hessian on a ball, every generated iterate from a sufficiently small ball remains there; each attempted update whose decrement test does not stop has unit step and a quadratic error bound.

[F3]

A Hessian lower bound gives strong convexity and gradient-gap bounds: the Hessian lower bound gives f(x)−f∗≥m∥x−x∗∥22/2 and ∥∇f(x)∥22≥2m(f(x)−f∗).

[F4]

Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment: on a segment in the convex domain, the second-order remainder is a Hessian quadratic form at an interior point.

[F5]

Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis: a real symmetric Hessian has an orthonormal eigenbasis, so mI⪯H⪯MI implies M−1I⪯H−1⪯m−1I.

[F6]

The Hessian of a C2 scalar field is symmetric and The Hessian matrix and critical points of a scalar field: the Hessian of a C2 real scalar objective is symmetric and uses the second-partial convention.

[F7]

Proof

1.1F1F5F6F7givenalgebra

At a nonstationary iterate, H:=Hf(x) is symmetric positive definite by [F6] and the lower bound. Put g:=∇f(x) and p:=−H−1g. The Newton decrement is λ2=gTH−1g=pTHp, and [F5] gives λ2≥∥g∥22/M and λ2≥m∥p∥22.

2.1F1F4F8step 1.1algebrachoose

Set TN:=2m(1−a)/M. For any trial 0<t≤TN, [F4] and Hf⪯MI on its segment give f(x+tp)≤f(x)−tλ2+(M/2)t2∥p∥22≤f(x)−atλ2, where the last inequality uses λ2≥m∥p∥22. If TN≥1, trial t=1 passes. If TN<1, [F8] gives a least j with bj≤TN; then bj>bTN and that candidate passes, so the first accepted step is at least τN.

3.1F1F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For any accepted update before the local ball, λ2≥∥g∥22/M by step 1.1 and t≥τN by step 2.1. Armijo acceptance and [F3] therefore give f(x+)−f∗≤f(x)−f∗−(aτN/M)∥g∥22≤(1−2amτN/M)(f(x)−f∗). The coefficient is positive because τN≤2b(1−a)m/M implies 2amτN/M≤4ab(1−a)(m/M)2<1; it is less than one because all factors in the subtracted term are positive.

4.1F1F3F5F8step 1.1step 3.1givenchoose

If x lies outside B(x∗,ρ), [F3] gives f(x)−f∗≥mρ2/2. Step 1.1 then gives λ2/2≥∥g∥22/(2M)≥(m/M)(f(x)−f∗)≥m2ρ2/(2M). Thus if ε<m2ρ2/(2M) the decrement test cannot stop outside the ball. Repeating step 3.1 gives a gap bounded by qNk(f(x0)−f∗); choose N with qNN(f(x0)−f∗)<mρ2/2, which exists by [F8]. If no earlier stop occurs, [F3] places the Nth generated iterate inside B(x∗,ρ). For larger tolerances the method may stop before this finite entry, and no post-stop sequence is asserted.

5.1F1F2step 4.1∎

Starting the canonical local theorem [F2] at the first generated iterate in B(x∗,ρ) shows that every later generated iterate remains in that ball. Whenever its decrement test does not stop, [F2] gives tk=1 and ∥xk+1−x∗∥2≤C∥xk−x∗∥22. If the decrement test stops, the algorithm returns there and no later update is asserted.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources