Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Analytic stationary phase with optimal truncation

Statement

Let n≥1, let U⊂Rn be a bounded open set, let Φ be holomorphic on a complex neighborhood of U‾, and let a∈Cc∞(U) have a holomorphic extension near 0. Assume 0∈supp⁡a, Φ(0)=Φ0, dΦ(0)=0, and dΦ(x)≠0 at every x∈supp⁡a∖{0}. Let H=−iΦ′′(0) be complex symmetric with positive-definite real part. Assume there are r,cquad,d0>0 such that

Im⁡(Φ(x)−Φ0)≥cquad∣x∣2(∣x∣≤r),Im⁡(Φ(x)−Φ0)≥d0(x∈supp⁡a, ∣x∣≥r).

Let χN be the finite-order cutoff sequence equal to one on a fixed neighborhood of 0, with 0≤χN≤1, and supported where these phase hypotheses hold. For every integer N≥1 and every λ≥1, put IN(λ)=∫eiλΦ(x)a(x)χN(x) dx. There are coefficients cj determined by the full Taylor series of the phase and amplitude at 0 and constants C,δ>0, independent of N,λ, such that

IN(λ)=eiλΦ0(2π/λ)n/2(det⁡H)−1/2(∑j=0N−1cjλ−j)+EN(λ), ∣cj∣≤Cj+1j!,∣e−iλΦ0EN(λ)∣≤CN+1N!λ−N−n/2+Ce−δλ.

The square-root branch is fixed by the preceding holomorphic Morse/Gaussian-contour lemma, and c0=a(0). Taking N=⌊ϵλ⌋ for sufficiently small fixed ϵ>0 and sufficiently large λ makes the normalized remainder e−iλΦ0EN(λ)=O(e−δ2λ) for some δ2>0. The expansion includes every coefficient through the stated truncation order; it is not only a leading-term estimate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The phase, amplitude, cutoff sequence, stationary point, and positivity hypotheses in the statement.

[F1]

Holomorphic Morse normalization and Gaussian contour: the phase is holomorphically reduced to a nondegenerate quadratic form, the Gaussian determinant branch is fixed, and admissible contours may be deformed when boundary terms vanish.

[F2]

Finite-order analytic cutoff sequence: χN equals one near 0, is supported in U, and has finite-order derivative bounds.

[F3]

Real analytic germs in several variables: analytic phase and amplitude germs extend holomorphically near 0.

[F4]

Multi-indexed power series in Cm and their absolute convergence: convergent Taylor series converge absolutely on smaller polydiscs.

[F5]

Cauchy's inequalities bound every derivative by a boundary bound on a compactly contained circle: a holomorphic function bounded on a polydisc has Taylor coefficients bounded by its supremum times inverse powers of the polyradius.

[F6]

The Euclidean inverse function theorem: a C1 map with invertible real derivative has a local real C1 inverse.

[F7]

Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains: the integral of a closed differential form over the boundary of a smooth chain is zero.

Proof

Given: The data in the statement.

1.1givenF2choose

Choose r>0 so that χN=1 on B2r(0) for every N, the phase and amplitude are holomorphic near B‾2r(0), and the stated positivity holds. The positive-phase hypothesis and compactness of supp⁡a∖Br(0) give Im⁡(Φ−Φ0)≥d>0 there. Since a is bounded and χN is bounded by one, the absolute value of that contribution after multiplication by e−iλΦ0 is at most ∥a∥∞∣U∣e−λd, uniformly in N. Thus only the integral over the fixed local ball affects the power series; the complement contributes O(e−dλ).

2.1F1F3F4F5step 1.1

Put ϕ=−i(Φ−Φ0), so Re⁡ϕ=Im⁡(Φ−Φ0) and ϕ′′(0)=H. Apply [F1] to obtain a holomorphic Morse coordinate w=Ψ(x) with ϕ(x)=12w⋅w. The transformed real ball is a local contour Γ through 0. The transformed amplitude b(w)=a(Ψ−1(w))det⁡DΨ−1(w) is holomorphic in a fixed polydisc and has coefficients bounded by MR−∣α∣ for some M,R>0 by [F3]–[F5].

3.1F1F6F7step 2.1given

Differentiating the Morse identity in [F1] twice at 0 gives ATA=H, where A=DΨ(0). Taylor's formula gives Re⁡(ϕ(tv))=12t2vT(Re⁡H)v+o(t2); comparing with Re⁡ϕ(tv)≥ct2∣v∣2 and dividing by t2/2 as t→0 yields vT(Re⁡H)v≥2c∣v∣2. For a real vector v, write Av=u+iw with u,w∈Rn. Then ∣u∣2−∣w∣2=Re⁡(vTHv)>0 when v≠0. In particular, the real projection on ARn is injective, hence bijective by dimension, and ARn={u+iKu:u∈Rn} for a real linear map K. For nonzero u, applying the strict inequality to v=A−1(u+iKu) gives ∣Ku∣<∣u∣; compactness of the unit sphere gives ∥K∥<1. The real inverse theorem [F6] makes the nonlinear contour Γ a graph u+i(Ku+r(u)), with r(u)=O(∣u∣2). For sufficiently small r0, the homotopy graphs u+i(Ku+tr(u)) remain in the holomorphic chart and satisfy Re⁡(w⋅w)≥ccontour∣u∣2 for ∣u∣≤r0, because the linear margin ∣u∣2−∣Ku∣2≥(1−∥K∥2)∣u∣2 dominates the O(∣u∣3) error. The homotopy u+itKu, 0≤t≤1, also has Re⁡(w⋅w)=∣u∣2−t2∣Ku∣2≥(1−∥K∥2)∣u∣2. On the fixed outer boundary these bounds, together with boundedness of the transformed amplitude and Jacobian, make the integrals O(e−c1λ). [F7] and the contour statement in [F1] therefore deform Γ to the real Gaussian contour, with only that exponential boundary term.

3.2F1F5step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Truncate the Taylor series after total degrees below 2N. On a smaller ball ∣w∣≤r0<R, the Cauchy bound [F5] and a geometric-series estimate give ∣b(w)−∑∣α∣<2Nbαwα∣≤C2N+1∣w∣2N. Integrating this remainder against e−λ∣w∣2/2 and using z=λ w bounds it by C3N+1λ−N−n/2∫Rn∣z∣2Ne−∣z∣2/2 dz≤C4N+1N!λ−N−n/2. For the last inequality, convexity gives (∑j=1nzj2)N≤nN−1∑j=1n∣zj∣2N. Fubini factors each summand into one-dimensional Gaussian moments; integration by parts gives MN=(2N−1)MN−1 with M0=2π, since the polynomial times Gaussian boundary term tends to zero. Hence MN=(2N−1)!!2π≤2NN!2π, and the displayed integral is at most (2n)N(2π)n/2N!. Absorb this fixed-dimensional factor into C4N+1. The extension of the Taylor polynomial P<2N(w)=∑∣α∣<2Nbαwα from ∣w∣≤r0 to the full real Gaussian integral needs a separate estimate uniform in N. For ∣w∣≥r0 and k<2N, ∣w∣k≤r0k−2N∣w∣2N. Cauchy's coefficient bound and the at most exponential count of degree-k multi-indices give DN:=∑k<2N∑∣α∣=k∣bα∣r0k−2N≤C5N+1, since r0,R are fixed positive constants and the sum has 2N terms after grouping degrees. Consequently ∫∣w∣≥r0∣P<2N(w)∣e−λ∣w∣2/2 dw≤C5N+1λ−N−n/2∫Rn∣z∣2Ne−∣z∣2/2 dz≤C6N+1N!λ−N−n/2. Thus the polynomial extension tail is controlled by the factorial remainder for every N, rather than by an exponential constant independent of N. The actual amplitude away from the local critical region and the contour boundary still have the exponential estimates from step 1.1 and [F1]; no extension of that amplitude outside its holomorphy neighborhood is used. Combining these estimates proves the stated normalized error for every N.

4.1F1F3F5step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Expand b(w)=∑αbαwα and group by total degree. Odd monomials integrate to zero over Rn because the Gaussian and domain are invariant under w↦−w. Each monomial of degree 2j contributes a constant times λ−n/2−j by the change of variables z=λ w. In one dimension, integration by parts gives Ik=∫t2ke−t2/2dt=(2k−1)Ik−1 and I0=2π, hence Ik=(2k−1)!!2π. Products give the n-dimensional moments. If α=2k and ∣k∣=j, then ∏l(2kl−1)!!≤(2j−1)!!≤2jj!; all monomials with an odd coordinate vanish. After scaling, every degree-2j moment is therefore at most C0j+1j!λ−j. The number of degree-2j multi-indices is at most Cnj+1 and ∣bα∣≤MR−2j, so the coefficient of λ−j is bounded by C1j+1j!. The Jacobian at zero contributes (det⁡H)−1/2 on the chosen branch, and the degree-zero coefficient is a(0).

5.1step 3.2algebra∎

For N=⌊ϵλ⌋ and sufficiently large λ so that N≥ϵλ/2≥1, the factorial term is at most CN+1λ−n/2(N/λ)N because N!≤NN. Choose ϵ>0 with Cϵ<1/2. Since N≤ϵλ, the displayed term is at most CN+1λ−n/2ϵN, which is bounded by C′e−δ2λ because N≥ϵλ/2 and 2−N≤e−(ϵlog⁡2)λ/2. Combining this with the exponential term in step 3.2 proves optimal truncation of the normalized remainder at order proportional to λ, with all stationary-phase coefficients retained. For the absolute remainder multiply this bound by ∣eiλΦ0∣=e−λIm⁡Φ0; no sign restriction on Im⁡Φ0 is imposed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources