Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Holomorphic Morse normalization and Gaussian contour

Statement

Let ϕ be holomorphic on a neighborhood of 0∈Cn, with dϕ(0)=0 and complex Hessian H=ϕ′′(0) invertible. There is a local biholomorphic coordinate map w=Ψ(z) with Ψ(0)=0 such that

ϕ(z)=ϕ(0)+12∑j=1nwj2.

Its linear part satisfies (det⁡DΨ(0))2=det⁡H. For a continuous parameter family of invertible Hessians H(p), near any fixed parameter p0 the determinant remains in a disc avoiding 0; choosing one square root at p0 therefore fixes a continuous branch on that neighborhood. If Re⁡H is positive definite, then

∫Rne−λxTHx/2 dx=(2π/λ)n/2(det⁡H)−1/2,λ>0,

with the integral interpreted as an absolutely convergent improper integral and the branch analytically continued from real positive-definite matrices. Finally, deforming a holomorphic contour preserves the integral of a holomorphic top-degree form when the contours are homologous through a region of holomorphy and the swept boundary integrals tend to zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic germ ϕ with a critical point at 0 and invertible Hessian.

[F1]

Real analytic germs in several variables: real-analytic germs complexify to holomorphic germs.

[F2]

Multi-indexed power series in Cm and their absolute convergence: the defining series converges absolutely on smaller polydiscs.

[F4]

The holomorphic inverse function theorem in several complex variables: an invertible complex derivative gives a local biholomorphism.

[F5]

A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically: holomorphic functions agreeing on a nonempty open subset of a connected domain agree throughout it.

[F6]

Dominated convergence: pointwise convergence under a common integrable majorant permits passage of limits through integrals.

[F7]

Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains: the integral of a closed differential form over the boundary of a smooth chain is zero.

[F8]
[F9]

The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries: the determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries.

[F11]

Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set: a C1 diffeomorphism changes compact Jordan integrals by its absolute Jacobian.

[F12]

Every Jordan exhaustion computes a nonnegative improper multiple integral: a compact Jordan exhaustion computes the nonnegative improper integral.

[F13]

The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π: ∫Re−t2 dt=π, by a proof that adds no choice axiom.

[F14]

Change of variable in an improper integral: a monotone differentiable substitution preserves convergent improper integrals on corresponding truncations.

[F15]

Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections: continuous functions on compact product rectangles have equal product and iterated Riemann integrals.

[F16]

For every fixed finite size at least one, the determinant of a real square matrix is a polynomial in its matrix entries: determinant is a polynomial in the matrix entries, with linear term tr⁡(M) in det⁡(I+tM) at t=0.

Proof

Given: The function ϕ and Hessian H in the statement.

1.1givenF1F3F4algebra

Because H is complex symmetric and invertible, some vector v has vTHv≠0: otherwise polarization would give uTHv=0 for every u,v, contradicting invertibility. Extend v to a basis and use this as a complex linear coordinate change, so H11≠0. From now on, compose each coordinate change with the preceding ones; Ψ denotes the final map from the original coordinates. The holomorphic equation ∂z1ϕ(z1,z′)=0 has a unique holomorphic solution z1=ψ(z′) near 0 by [F3] and [F4], since ∂z1ϕ(0)=0 and ∂z12ϕ(0)=H11≠0.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1construct

Set t=z1−ψ(z′). Taylor's formula in t, with the linear term zero, gives ϕ(ψ(z′)+t,z′)=ϕ(ψ(z′),z′)+t2a(t,z′),a(t,z′)=∫01(1−s)∂z12ϕ(ψ(z′)+st,z′) ds. The integral is holomorphic by locally uniform convergence of the power series [F2]; a(0,0)=H11/2≠0. Shrink the polydisc so a=a(0,0)(1+b) with ∣b∣<1. The binomial series for (1+b)1/2 converges absolutely by [F2], so w1=t2a(t,z′) is holomorphic and has nonzero t-derivative at 0.

3.1F4step 2.1algebra

By [F4], (t,z′)↦(w1,z′) is biholomorphic near 0, and the phase becomes ϕ(ψ(z′),z′)+w12/2. The Hessian of the reduced phase in z′ is the Schur complement H22−H21H11−1H12. It is invertible because the block determinant formula gives det⁡H=H11det⁡(H22−H21H11−1H12).

3.2F8F9F10F11F12F13F14F15algebrastep 2.1

For real symmetric positive-definite H, [F8] gives H=LL∗ with L lower triangular and positive diagonal. Since H is real, L‾ is another such factorization; uniqueness in [F8] gives L=L‾, so L is real and H=LLT. On each ball BR, the map x↦LTx sends a compact Jordan set to a compact Jordan set; [F11] changes variables by ∣det⁡L∣−1. Letting R→∞ and using [F12] gives the corresponding nonnegative improper-integral equality. Since det⁡L>0, [F9]–[F10] give det⁡H=(det⁡L)2. Repeated compact-rectangle Fubini [F15] factors the standard Gaussian integral on [−R,R]n into one-dimensional integrals, and [F12] lets R→∞. By [F13] and the substitution t=x/2 in [F14], each one-dimensional integral of e−x2/2 is 2π. Finally, z=λw scales the integral by λ−n/2, proving the formula for real positive-definite H with the positive determinant root.

4.1step 3.1inductionalgebragiven

Repeating steps 1.1–2.1 on the reduced phase proves the normal form by induction on n, with the constant phase as the n=0 case. Because Ψ is the composite from the original coordinates, differentiating ϕ(z)=ϕ(0)+12Ψ(z)TΨ(z) twice at 0 gives the original Hessian identity H=(DΨ(0))TDΨ(0); taking determinants gives the asserted square relation. For a continuous parameter family, continuity of det⁡H lets one restrict to a neighborhood whose determinant image lies in a disc avoiding zero, where a square-root branch can be fixed from its base value.

4.2F5F6F10F16step 3.2algebra

For complex symmetric H with positive-definite real part, the Gaussian integral is holomorphic in its entries: on each compact subset of this matrix domain, the integrand and its entry derivatives are bounded by a polynomial times e−c∣x∣2 for some c>0, so [F6] permits differentiation under the integral. This domain is convex, hence connected, and det⁡H≠0 there because Hv=0 would imply Re⁡(v∗Hv)=v∗(Re⁡H)v>0 for v≠0. For Ht=I+t(H−I), [F16] and determinant multiplicativity give ddtdet⁡Ht=(det⁡Ht)tr⁡(Ht−1(H−I)). Thus L(H)=∫01tr⁡(Ht−1(H−I)) dt depends holomorphically on H, satisfies eL(H)=det⁡H, and is zero at I. When H is real positive definite, its segment Ht is real positive definite, so L(H) is real and the branch eL(H)/2 is positive. The real Gaussian formula from step 3.2 and the complex integral formula agree on a real open set of positive-definite matrices. In a polydisc centered at any point of that set, apply the one-variable identity theorem successively in the independent entries of a complex symmetric matrix; then [F5] extends the identity from that polydisc to the connected matrix domain.

5.1F7given∎

The holomorphic n-form in the statement is closed: in complex coordinates its exterior derivative has repeated holomorphic differentials and no antiholomorphic coefficients. The difference of two homologous admissible contours is the boundary of the swept chain. By [F7], its integral is the boundary integral on the truncation of that chain; the stated decay makes this term tend to zero as the truncation expands. Therefore the contour integrals agree.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

111 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources