Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The holomorphic inverse function theorem in several complex variables

Statement

Let m1, let UCm be open, let F:UCm be holomorphic, and let aU. If detJCF(a)0, then there are open neighbourhoods U0U of a and V0 of F(a) such that FU0:U0V0 is biholomorphic.

If G:V0U0 denotes the inverse, then

DG(w)=DF(G(w))1(wV0).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open set U, the holomorphic map F:UCm, and the point aU with detJCF(a)0.

[L1]

A holomorphic map into Cm has holomorphic scalar components, and holomorphic scalar functions of several variables are smooth in the real coordinates (A map into Cn is holomorphic exactly when each of its components is, Holomorphic functions of several variables are smooth and their complex derivatives are holomorphic).

[L2]

For a complex-linear automorphism, the real Jacobian determinant is the squared modulus of the complex determinant (The real Jacobian determinant of a complex-linear automorphism is the squared modulus of its complex determinant).

[L3]

A C1 map of open subsets of R2m with invertible real derivative has a local C1 inverse, and that inverse derivative is the inverse linear map (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

[F1]

A biholomorphism is a bijective holomorphic map with holomorphic inverse (Biholomorphic maps between open sets in Cm).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], every component of F is holomorphic and therefore smooth as a real-valued pair of functions on R2m. Hence the underlying real map F:UR2mR2m is C1 on a neighbourhood of a.

givenL1
1.2

The real derivative DF(a) is the same linear map as the complex differential, now read over R. Since detJCF(a)0, [L2] gives detRDF(a)0, so DF(a) is invertible as a real linear map.

givenL2
2.1

Apply [L3] to the real map from step 1.1 and the invertible derivative from step 1.2. This gives open neighbourhoods U0 of a and V0 of F(a) such that FU0:U0V0 is bijective and has a C1 inverse G:V0U0. Moreover, DG(w)=DF(G(w))1(wV0).

step 1.1step 1.2L3construct
3.1

For each wV0, the linear map DF(G(w)) is C-linear because F is holomorphic, so its inverse DG(w) is also C-linear. Step 2.1 already gives G real differentiable at every point with that differential, hence the defining linear approximation for holomorphy uses a C-linear derivative. Therefore G is holomorphic on V0. Together with the holomorphy of FU0, [F1] makes FU0 biholomorphic.

step 2.1F1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources