Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Real analytic inverse and implicit functions

Statement

Let f be a real analytic map between open subsets of Rn, n1. If Df(a) is invertible, f has a real analytic local inverse near f(a). Let P(x,y) be real analytic near (a,b)Rd×Rk, k1, with P(a,b)=0 and DyP(a,b) invertible. On sufficiently small neighborhoods its zero set is exactly the graph of a unique real analytic y=g(x) with g(a)=b.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real analytic map f with Df(a) invertible; for the implicit assertion, analytic P(x,y) with P(a,b)=0 and DyP(a,b) invertible.

[F1]

Real-coefficient analytic maps complexify near their real centre. (Real analytic germs in several variables).

[F2]

A holomorphic map with nonsingular complex Jacobian has a biholomorphic local inverse. (The holomorphic inverse function theorem in several complex variables).

[F3]

Continuous separately holomorphic functions have absolutely convergent local power-series expansions. (A continuous separately holomorphic function is the sum of an absolutely convergent power series with Cauchy-integral coefficients on every smaller polydisc).

Proof

1.1

Complexify f to F on a conjugation-invariant polydisc by F1. Its complex Jacobian at the real point a is the same real matrix as Df(a), so its determinant is nonzero. F2 supplies a holomorphic inverse G on an open neighborhood of f(a). Shrink its domain to a conjugation-invariant polydisc V on which both G(w) and G(w) lie in the injectivity neighborhood of F. This is possible by continuity at f(a), since both limits are a.

givenF1F2
2.1

Real coefficients give F(z)=F(z). Thus F(G(w))=w=F(G(w)) for wV. Injectivity gives G(w)=G(w), so G maps the real slice into the real slice. Each component is continuous and separately holomorphic (restrict its complex differential to a coordinate line), so F3 expands it at the real centre f(a). Conjugating this series and using the displayed identity and F4 shows every coefficient equals its conjugate. The expansion therefore restricts to a real analytic inverse.

step 1.1F3F4
3.1

Set H(x,y)=(x,P(x,y)). Its derivative at (a,b) has block matrix (I0DxPDyP), whose determinant is detDyP0. Steps 1.1–2.1 give a real analytic inverse K near (a,0). The first coordinate identity H(K(x,z))=(x,z) forces K(x,z)=(x,k(x,z)). Define g(x)=k(x,0) after shrinking to a product neighborhood.

givenstep 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

The identity H(K(x,0))=(x,0) implies P(x,g(x))=0 and g(a)=b. Conversely, if (x,y) is in the chosen inverse neighborhood and P(x,y)=0, then H(x,y)=(x,0), hence (x,y)=K(x,0) and y=g(x). This proves both the graph description and local uniqueness.

step 3.1algebra

Source notes

Real inverse/implicit reduction used in Gantumur §5, printed p. 12. The local proof below derives the analytic assertion from the earlier holomorphic inverse theorem and power-series expansion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources