How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Analytic ODE systems from majorants
Statement
For an analytic map near , , the problem , , has a unique analytic solution germ. If and all Taylor coefficients of at are nonnegative, then the solution has nonnegative Taylor coefficients.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is analytic near in real variables, . The optional positivity assertion assumes and nonnegative Taylor coefficients of H.
A finite analytic family has a common rational geometric majorant. (Geometric majorants for analytic germs).
Zero-constant substitution preserves coefficient majorisation. (Operations preserving coefficient majorisation).
An analytic equation with nonzero derivative in its unknown has a unique local analytic branch. (Real analytic inverse and implicit functions).
Geometrically bounded coefficients define a holomorphic sum with termwise derivatives. (An absolutely convergent multi-indexed power series is holomorphic and differentiates termwise).
Proof
Put , adjoin , and write . The autonomous system is , . A formal series has the unique recursion . This coefficient depends only on : each substituted series has zero constant term, so no positive-degree factor can use . Its zeroth coordinate is exactly .
With , F1 supplies majorising every component of by . The scalar equation , , has an analytic branch by F3: the derivative in at zero is one. Its coefficient recursion gives and every subsequent coefficient nonnegative. Differentiating the identity yields near zero, since the denominator there is one. Solving this quadratic on the branch through zero gives . The square root is the analytic branch with value one at zero, so a positive convergence neighborhood is explicit; its positive real endpoint is singular, since differentiating there would give if W extended analytically through it. No entire majorant is claimed.
Compare the recursion in step 1.1 with the vector whose L components are W. At degree zero the initial coefficients agree. If for , F2 bounds by . Dividing by gives the next coefficient bound. This induction proves at every degree.
Choose strictly inside the convergence radius of W. Its coefficients obey , where . Step 2.1 transfers this bound to z. F4 and F2 show the series sums and its compositions differentiate as in the formal recursion on a smaller interval, so . The recursion also forces the Taylor series of every analytic solution; hence two such germs coincide. Finally, for the original nonnegative H with , the recursion consists solely of nonnegative sums and products from its zero initial coefficient, so every coefficient of v is nonnegative.
Source notes
Gantumur, §3 equations (26)–(34), printed pp. 7–8, Theorem 15. The autonomous augmentation and quadratic majorant below avoid the misnormalized scalar formula (18).
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gantumur, Math 580 Lecture Notes 2: The Cauchy-Kovalevskaya Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)