How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Convergence of the Goursat majorant
Statement
For integers and , choose with and put . The equation has a unique analytic branch through with nonnegative coefficients. The solution of , , is analytic with nonnegative coefficients. Setting gives a convergent majorant system solution of the preceding lemma, with . Its initial trace is nonnegative coefficientwise but need not vanish identically.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positive parameters M,r, the finite positive integers N,d, and the prescribed Goursat majorant equation in the statement. A convergence proof and a choice of rho are required.
A nonzero implicit derivative gives a local analytic branch. (Real analytic inverse and implicit functions).
An analytic ODE has a unique analytic germ and preserves nonnegative coefficients with zero initial data. (Analytic ODE systems from majorants).
An analytic positive-trace majorant with zero origin jet dominates the formal zero-data solution. (Positive majorants dominate the Cauchy recursion).
Proof
Admissible choices exist: gives . Fix any rho allowed by the statement, so . The analytic function vanishes at and has . F1 gives g. Writing yields . At k=1 the sum is empty and ; successive coefficients are nonnegative.
The function is analytic near zero, and its power-series coefficients in sigma,v are nonnegative by the finite binomial expansion and step 1.1. F2 therefore gives an analytic v with nonnegative coefficients. Moreover . Choose a positive sigma-radius small enough that is inside the actual convergence radius of g and less than r, and that . These inequalities hold by continuity and their zero origin values.
Put and . The algebraic identity of step 1.1 is equivalent to , hence on the neighborhood of step 2.1. With we have , , , and . Substitution gives exactly the system G of F3.
On a sufficiently small polydisc in (t,x), is smaller than the radius selected in step 2.1, so this substitution converges absolutely. The coefficients of U and of its trace are nonnegative because those of v and the linear form are nonnegative. At the origin, and . Thus every hypothesis on U in F3 holds and U dominates the formal zero-data solution.
Source notes
Gantumur, §4 equations (47)–(52) and Remark 19, printed p. 10.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gantumur, Math 580 Lecture Notes 2: The Cauchy-Kovalevskaya Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)