How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
State similarity preserves input-output data
Statement
Let , , and be integers. Suppose a noiseless experiment has matrices , , and , initial state , and common inputs . For any invertible define The experiment with and the same inputs has the same output at every sample . The equality holds for every horizon and every common input sequence.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A noiseless real discrete experiment of horizon , matrices , initial state , common inputs , and an invertible matrix .
Discrete linear input-state-output experiments: the state and output equations are and at the stated samples.
Invertible matrices and the general linear group : an invertible has a two-sided inverse , so .
Matrix multiplication is associative, unital, distributive, and compatible with scalar multiplication: conformable matrix products are associative and identity matrices act on either side.
Proof
At , the transformed initial state is . If for , then [F1] and the definitions give ; [F2] cancels and [F3] permits regrouping. Induction proves for .
For every such , the transformed output is by [F1] and [F2]. Since the horizon, initial state, and inputs were arbitrary, this holds for every common finite input experiment.
Coordinate diagram
The square records the state-coordinate identity : both paths send to . The proof above establishes the output identity by induction and does not rely on the diagram.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mohammed Dahleh, Munther A. Dahleh, and George Verghese, Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control, Chapter 25: Minimal State-Space Realization (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sanjay Lall, Engr207c: Operator Theory and Linear Systems, State-Space Realization lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)