How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Discrete linear input-state-output experiments
Definition
Let , , and be integers, and let be a fixed sampling interval. A real discrete linear input-state-output experiment of state dimension , input dimension , output dimension , and horizon consists of matrices , , and , an initial state , and known inputs in . The states are defined by and the exact sampled outputs at times are for . When observations are perturbed, the observed outputs are for deterministic error vectors ; the exact-data convention is for all . No probability law is assigned to the errors. A numerical or discretization error that changes the forward map is distinct from this additive observation error.
For the fixed matrices , the Markov parameters are interpreted using the infinite-horizon impulse experiment: extend the same state and output equations to all , with zero initial state, , and for . Its output at sample is for every . The horizon- restriction records this identity only for ; when , it records only and has no input samples. Matrix powers use and . If , the state space consists of its single zero vector and the matrices have the corresponding empty shapes.
Depends on
- The vector space $M_{m \times n}(F) := F^{\,m \times n}$ of $m$ by $n$ matrices over a field, with entrywise operations
- Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix $I_n$, including zero-sized shapes
- The standard formulas $\langle x,y\rangle=\sum_{k<n}x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb R^n$ and $\sum_{k<n}x_k\overline{y_k}$ on $\mathbb C^n$ are inner products
Used by
- Exact block-Hankel realization Algorithm
- Continuous-time frequencies alias under fixed discrete sampling Counterexample
- A small Hankel singular value amplifies a realization perturbation Example
- An unobserved state mode Example
- Two similar realizations with identical data Example
- Finite observability identifies the initial state Theorem
- Hankel realization recovers a controllable and observable system Theorem
- State similarity preserves input-output data Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mohammed Dahleh, Munther A. Dahleh, and George Verghese, Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control, Chapter 25: Minimal State-Space Realization (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sanjay Lall, Engr207c: Operator Theory and Linear Systems, State-Space Realization lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)