How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact block-Hankel realization
Definition
Fix integers , , and . The input is a list of exact Markov matrices Use the exact-real linear-algebra model: an exact rank test returns the rank of a finite real matrix; a thin rank- singular-value decomposition of a rank- matrix returns with diagonal and strictly positive, and an exact Moore--Penrose routine returns a matrix satisfying the four Penrose equations. A routine failure or a returned object that fails its stated exact identities is reported explicitly. This specification makes no finite-bit computability or complexity claim for arbitrary real inputs.
Form the -by- block Hankel matrices each of shape by . Execute the following steps.
-
Apply the exact rank test to . If it fails, return
failed-solve; if its value is not , returninconsistent-rank-data. -
If , use the empty factorization with of shape by and of shape by . If , obtain the thin rank- SVD in the declared exact model and set Verify , , and ; if any operation or verification fails, return
failed-solve. -
Compute the exact Moore--Penrose inverses and and verify their four Penrose equations. If a computation or verification fails, return
failed-solve. -
Set , let be the first columns of , and let be the first rows of . Return
successwith . For , these are the corresponding empty matrices.
The routine can report failed-solve for a failed or invalid exact-operation
backend. The existence theorems for finite-matrix SVDs and Moore--Penrose
inverses ensure that the exact mathematical operations requested in steps 2–3
exist; this definition alone asserts no noisy rank selection or stable
parameter recovery.
Depends on
- Discrete linear input-state-output experiments
- Rank and nullity of a linear map with finite-dimensional domain
- Every linear map between finite-dimensional real or complex inner product spaces admits a singular value decomposition
- The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse $A^+$ as the solution of the four Penrose equations
- Every finite real or complex matrix has a unique Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse
- Matrix multiplication is associative, unital, distributive, and compatible with scalar multiplication
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mohammed Dahleh, Munther A. Dahleh, and George Verghese, Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control, Chapter 25: Minimal State-Space Realization (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sanjay Lall, Engr207c: Operator Theory and Linear Systems, State-Space Realization lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)