Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A small Hankel singular value amplifies a realization perturbation

Example

Use the exact block-Hankel realization procedure with q=d=m=p=1, and assume that every exact rank, SVD, and Moore--Penrose call made in both runs completes and passes its stated exact checks. For any 0<ε≤1, the scalar system A=0, B=ε, C=1 has Markov data M0=ε and M1=0, and H0=[ε] has singular value ε. The exact algorithm returns A^=0. If only M1 is perturbed to M~1=ε, the pair (M0,M~1) is itself generated by the scalar system A~=1/ε, B~=ε, C~=1, so the exact algorithm returns A~. Thus an absolute Markov-data perturbation ε can change the recovered transition value by 1/ε.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: 0<ε≤1, the two scalar Markov-data pairs, the exact block-Hankel procedure with q=d=m=p=1, and exact rank, SVD, and Moore--Penrose calls in both runs that complete and pass the stated checks.

[F1]

Discrete linear input-state-output experiments: Mk=CAkB for scalar real state-space systems.

[F2]

The singular values of a linear map as the eigenvalues of the positive square root of T^*T: singular values of a finite-dimensional endomorphism are the eigenvalues of ∣H0∣=H0TH0.

[F3]

Exact block-Hankel realization: for q=1, H0=[M0], H1=[M1], and the returned transition is A^=O^+H1R^+ for the exact rank-one factorization H0=O^R^.

[F4]

Hankel realization recovers a controllable and observable system: when O1 and R1 have rank 1 and the algorithm's exact calls complete and pass their checks, the data yield a successful realization similar to the generating scalar system.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2F3F4algebra

For the first system, M0=CB=ε and M1=CAB=0 by [F1]. Thus the q=1 blocks are H0=[ε] and H1=[0] by [F3], and [F2] gives the singular value of H0 as ε2=ε. Here O1=[1] and R1=[ε] both have rank 1. By [F4] and the given successful-call hypothesis, the exact algorithm succeeds and its scalar transition is similar to A=0; scalar similarity leaves that transition equal to 0.

1.2givenF1F3F4algebra

For the perturbed data, the scalar system with A~=1/ε, B~=ε, and C~=1 has M~0=ε and M~1=ε by [F1]; [F3] identifies these as its q=1 Hankel blocks. Its O1=[1] and R1=[ε] again have rank 1, so [F4] and the given successful-call hypothesis imply that the exact algorithm returns a scalar transition similar to A~. A one-dimensional similarity does not change a scalar, hence A~ is returned.

2.1givenstep 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Take εn=1/n2 for positive integers n. The perturbation size is εn=1/n→0, while the change in transition value is 1/εn=n→∞ and the singular value of H0 is 1/n2→0. This is an exact finite example of unbounded sensitivity as the Hankel singular value approaches zero; it makes no claim of noisy rank-selection correctness.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.