How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A small Hankel singular value amplifies a realization perturbation
Example
Use the exact block-Hankel realization procedure with , and assume that every exact rank, SVD, and Moore--Penrose call made in both runs completes and passes its stated exact checks. For any , the scalar system , , has Markov data and , and has singular value . The exact algorithm returns . If only is perturbed to , the pair is itself generated by the scalar system , , , so the exact algorithm returns . Thus an absolute Markov-data perturbation can change the recovered transition value by .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the two scalar Markov-data pairs, the exact block-Hankel procedure with , and exact rank, SVD, and Moore--Penrose calls in both runs that complete and pass the stated checks.
Discrete linear input-state-output experiments: for scalar real state-space systems.
The singular values of a linear map as the eigenvalues of the positive square root of T^*T: singular values of a finite-dimensional endomorphism are the eigenvalues of .
Exact block-Hankel realization: for , , , and the returned transition is for the exact rank-one factorization .
Hankel realization recovers a controllable and observable system: when and have rank and the algorithm's exact calls complete and pass their checks, the data yield a successful realization similar to the generating scalar system.
Verification
For the first system, and by [F1]. Thus the blocks are and by [F3], and [F2] gives the singular value of as . Here and both have rank . By [F4] and the given successful-call hypothesis, the exact algorithm succeeds and its scalar transition is similar to ; scalar similarity leaves that transition equal to .
For the perturbed data, the scalar system with , , and has and by [F1]; [F3] identifies these as its Hankel blocks. Its and again have rank , so [F4] and the given successful-call hypothesis imply that the exact algorithm returns a scalar transition similar to . A one-dimensional similarity does not change a scalar, hence is returned.
Take for positive integers . The perturbation size is , while the change in transition value is and the singular value of is . This is an exact finite example of unbounded sensitivity as the Hankel singular value approaches zero; it makes no claim of noisy rank-selection correctness.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.