How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Irreducibly weak row diagonal dominance with a strict row guarantees Jacobi and Gauss–Seidel convergence
Statement
Let and satisfy weak row diagonal dominance
with strict inequality in at least one row. Assume the directed off-diagonal graph, with edge when and , is strongly connected (paths of length are allowed). Then the Jacobi and fixed-order Gauss–Seidel iterations defined by Finite-budget Jacobi stationary iteration and Finite-budget Gauss–Seidel stationary iteration converge in exact arithmetic to the unique solution of for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a real matrix satisfying the displayed weak row inequalities, at least one strict row, and a strongly connected directed off-diagonal graph.
Every row satisfies , with at least one strict row; the off-diagonal graph has edges exactly when and is strongly connected.
, where is diagonal and are the negative strict lower and upper parts (Diagonal, lower, and upper parts in the stationary-iteration convention).
Jacobi has iteration matrix (Finite-budget Jacobi stationary iteration).
Fixed-order Gauss–Seidel has iteration matrix (Finite-budget Gauss–Seidel stationary iteration).
For the comparison matrix with row sums at most , strongly connected positive-entry graph, and a strict row, there is with (An irreducible row-substochastic matrix with a strict row has a weighted contraction).
In a stationary split , the update has iteration matrix (Stationary iteration from a matrix splitting ).
A stationary iteration converges to the unique solution for every right-hand side and every start exactly when (A stationary splitting converges for every start if and only if its iteration matrix has spectral radius below ).
A lower-triangular system with nonzero diagonal has a unique forward substitution solution (Forward and backward substitution are correct, unique, and quadratic in scalar operations).
Proof
If and , [A1] forces every off-diagonal entry in row to vanish, contradicting strong connectivity. If , the strict-row hypothesis forces . Hence every diagonal entry is nonzero, and the Jacobi and lower-triangular Gauss–Seidel solves are defined by [L5].
Define and for . Its row sums are at most , one is strictly below , and its positive-entry graph is the graph in [A1]. By [L2], choose with , and set .
By [F1], entrywise. For , nonnegativity gives . Thus every eigenvalue of satisfies , so .
Set and . Then , is strictly lower triangular, and . Thus . Since , multiplying by gives . Consequently .
Because and is strictly lower triangular, . Entrywise absolute values obey , so . The same weighted-vector estimate as in step 3.1 yields ; hence .
By [L3]–[L4], the two spectral-radius bounds imply convergence to the unique solution of for every right-hand side and every initial vector.
Depends on
- Diagonal, lower, and upper parts in the stationary-iteration convention
- Finite-budget Jacobi stationary iteration
- Finite-budget Gauss–Seidel stationary iteration
- An irreducible row-substochastic matrix with a strict row has a weighted contraction
- Stationary iteration from a matrix splitting $A=M-N$
- A stationary splitting converges for every start if and only if its iteration matrix has spectral radius below $1$
- Forward and backward substitution are correct, unique, and quadratic in scalar operations
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yousef Saad, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd ed., §4.2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)