How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
SOR converges exactly for positive-definite A and relaxation parameter in (0, 2)
Statement
Let , be Hermitian with strictly positive diagonal, and let . Write by Diagonal, lower, and upper parts in the stationary-iteration convention, and define
The SOR iteration is . It converges to the unique solution of for every if and only if is positive definite (meaning for every nonzero ) and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a Hermitian matrix with positive diagonal, a real , and arbitrary .
, , and .
SOR uses and (Finite-budget successive over-relaxation stationary iteration).
The fixed diagonal/lower/upper convention gives for Hermitian (Diagonal, lower, and upper parts in the stationary-iteration convention).
For an invertible matrix and , the stationary update is (Stationary iteration from a matrix splitting ).
This iteration converges to the unique solution for every right-hand side and every start exactly when (A stationary splitting converges for every start if and only if its iteration matrix has spectral radius below ).
Hermitian positive definite means and for every nonzero (Hermitian positive-definite matrices and Cholesky factorisation A = LL* with positive diagonal).
A lower-triangular system with nonzero diagonal has a unique forward substitution solution (Forward and backward substitution are correct, unique, and quadratic in scalar operations).
Determinants are multiplicative for same-sized square matrices over a commutative ring (For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, ).
The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries (The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries).
When the characteristic polynomial splits as , the determinant is (If in , then : determinant is the product of the eigenvalues counted with algebraic multiplicity).
Every complex polynomial splits over (The complex numbers are algebraically closed).
Proof
By [A1] and [F1], is lower triangular with diagonal , hence invertible by [L5]. Also by [L1], so [L2] applies with iteration matrix . The matrix is upper triangular with diagonal entries . Thus [L6]–[L7] give and . From and multiplicativity, .
For sufficiency, suppose is positive definite and . Then is positive definite. For an eigenpair with , one has since and is invertible. Put . Then , so . Therefore for every eigenvalue and .
If SOR converges for every right-hand side and start, [L3] gives . By [L8]–[L9], . Step 1.1 therefore gives , which for real is equivalent to .
Assume now that SOR converges for every right-hand side and start. Then by [L3], so is not an eigenvalue of and is invertible. By [L2], is invertible. For , its unique solution is . For arbitrary nonzero , set and . The homogeneous SOR recurrence gives , hence . Expanding the Hermitian quadratic form gives . The last equality follows from [L1] and [F1].
By step 2.1, . Summing the identity in step 2.2 from to and taking (the error tends to by the assumed convergence) gives . Moreover : otherwise step 2.2 implies , contrary to invertibility of . Since has positive diagonal, the first summand is strictly positive and all others are nonnegative. Thus for every nonzero , so [L4] gives that is positive definite.
By [L3], implies convergence to the unique solution for every right-hand side and every initial vector. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 prove the reverse implication.
Remarks
The conclusion is exact-arithmetic asymptotic convergence; it is not a one-step error decrease or a finite-precision accuracy guarantee. No optimal- formula is asserted.
Depends on
- Diagonal, lower, and upper parts in the stationary-iteration convention
- Finite-budget successive over-relaxation stationary iteration
- Stationary iteration from a matrix splitting $A=M-N$
- A stationary splitting converges for every start if and only if its iteration matrix has spectral radius below $1$
- Hermitian positive-definite matrices and Cholesky factorisation A = LL* with positive diagonal
- Forward and backward substitution are correct, unique, and quadratic in scalar operations
- For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, $\det(AB)=\det(A)\det(B)$
- The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries
- If $\chi_T(x)=\prod_{i<n}(x-\lambda_i)$ in $F[x]$, then $\det(T)=\prod_{i<n}\lambda_i$: determinant is the product of the eigenvalues counted with algebraic multiplicity
- The complex numbers are algebraically closed
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yousef Saad, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd ed., §4.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Rutgers University MATH 574, Lecture Notes, §3 Matrix iterative methods (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Bindel, Matrix Computations (CS 6210), Cornell University, Fall 2012, Lecture 31 (standard reference, not scraped)