Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Independent-private-message DM-MAC capacity region

Statement

For the average-joint-error no-feedback code of No-feedback independent-private-message DM-MAC code over the finite DM-MAC, the capacity region is the closure of the union over all finite Q and laws PQPX1∣QPX2∣QW of R1≤I(X1;Y∣X2,Q),R2≤I(X2;Y∣X1,Q),R1+R2≤I(X1,X2;Y∣Q). Here Q is a public time-sharing variable independent of both private messages; conditional on each Q=q, the two input laws are a product. This result does not characterize maximal-error capacity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite two-user DM-MAC, independent uniform private messages, separate deterministic encoders without feedback, one joint decoder and average joint error tending to zero.

[F1]

No-feedback independent-private-message DM-MAC code: the messages are independent uniform and the separate input words are deterministic functions of their own messages.

[F2]

Two-user discrete memoryless multiple-access channel: conditional on the input words, P(yn∣x1n,x2n)=∏iW(yi∣x1i,x2i).

[F3]

Finite mutual information: finite mutual information is the finite joint-to-product KL sum in nats.

[F4]

Finite conditional mutual information: finite conditional information averages the mutual information of the conditional laws over positive-mass conditioning values.

[F5]

Finite entropy and mutual-information chain rules: finite entropy and mutual information satisfy their chain rules.

[F6]

Finite-alphabet Fano inequality: for a finite message and finite observation, H(M∣Yn)≤ln⁡2+Peln⁡∣M∣.

[F7]

Finite conditional entropy: conditional entropy is the finite average of conditional entropies over positive-mass conditioning values.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2choose

Fix a finite law PQPX1∣QPX2∣Q and a nonnegative rate pair satisfying each subset information bound strictly whenever that subset has positive total rate. Use a singleton message set for every zero-rate user. Choose a deterministic sequence qn whose empirical distribution tends to PQ. Independently for each user and message, generate input coordinates with law PXj∣Q=qi. The two codebooks are independent.

1.2F1F2F6algebra

For a converse code and nonempty S, Fano [F6] applied to the decoded subtuple, with the complementary messages supplied as side information, gives nR(S)≤I(MS;Yn∣MSc)+ln⁡2+PenR(S). The subtuple error is at most the joint error.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1choose

For each nonempty S⊆{1,2} define iS(x1n,x2n;yn)=∑iln⁡W(yi∣x1i,x2i)PY∣XSc,Q(yi∣xSc,i,qi), where the denominator averages over the product input laws for users in S and a summand is −∞ whenever its numerator is zero. For each subset with R(S)>0, choose a threshold nτS with R(S)<τS<I(XS;Y∣XSc,Q). Decode the unique pair passing all these tests; a subset of zero total rate has no wrong-message candidates and its test is omitted; if no pair or more than one pair passes all the retained tests, output the fixed default pair (1,1).

2.2F1F2F3F5F7step 1.2

By the chain rule [F5] and the memoryless law [F2], for S={1}, I(M1;Yi∣Yi−1,M2)=H(Yi∣Yi−1,M2)−H(Yi∣X1i,X2i)≤H(Yi∣X2i)−H(Yi∣X1i,X2i)=I(X1i;Yi∣X2i). The inequality holds because X2i is determined by M2, so conditioning on Yi−1 cannot increase the first entropy. Interchanging users proves the other individual bound. For S={1,2}, H(Yi∣Yi−1)≤H(Yi) and the same channel-law identity give I(M1,M2;Yi∣Yi−1)≤I(X1i,X2i;Yi).

3.1F2F3F4step 2.1algebra

For the true pair and every tested subset, the information-density summands are independent across coordinates, uniformly bounded on their finite positive supports, and their mean average tends to I(XS;Y∣XSc,Q). Their sum variance is O(n), so Chebyshev's inequality makes all tested true tests pass with probability tending to one.

4.1F1F2step 2.1step 3.1algebraalgebrachoose

Fix a wrong-message set S and condition on the true complementary codewords and output. The candidate codewords indexed by S are independent of the output with the product input law used in the denominator of iS; hence the likelihood ratio eiS has conditional expectation one. Markov's inequality bounds a false threshold pass by e−nτS. There are at most enR(S)+o(n) candidates of this error type, so τS>R(S) makes the union of the three error classes vanish. The ensemble-average error tends to zero, and a deterministic codebook with error no larger than that average exists. A wrong-message set necessarily has positive total rate, since the zero-rate message sets are singletons. If both rates are zero, the unique message pair is always returned with zero error. Scaling any nonnegative pair in the displayed closed region by 1−ε, with 0<ε<1, makes every positive-total-rate subset inequality strict; letting ε decrease to zero therefore gives all closed faces, including cases where a zero-rate subset has zero information.

5.1F1F4step 1.2step 2.2algebra∎

Let Q be uniform on {1,…,n}, independent of the messages, and set (X1,X2,Y)=(X1Q,X2Q,YQ). Since each input is a function of its own independent message, PX1X2∣Q=PX1∣QPX2∣Q. Averaging step 2.2 over i gives the three stated conditional mutual-information bounds with this finite Q. Because Y has a finite alphabet, I(MS;Yn∣MSc)≤nln⁡∣Y∣; step 1.2 then bounds each rate for Pe<1/2, so its normalized Fano remainder vanishes along a reliable sequence. Divide step 1.2 by n, let Pe→0, then take closure.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources