How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independent-private-message DM-MAC capacity region
Statement
For the average-joint-error no-feedback code of No-feedback independent-private-message DM-MAC code over the finite DM-MAC, the capacity region is the closure of the union over all finite and laws of Here is a public time-sharing variable independent of both private messages; conditional on each , the two input laws are a product. This result does not characterize maximal-error capacity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite two-user DM-MAC, independent uniform private messages, separate deterministic encoders without feedback, one joint decoder and average joint error tending to zero.
No-feedback independent-private-message DM-MAC code: the messages are independent uniform and the separate input words are deterministic functions of their own messages.
Two-user discrete memoryless multiple-access channel: conditional on the input words, .
Finite mutual information: finite mutual information is the finite joint-to-product KL sum in nats.
Finite conditional mutual information: finite conditional information averages the mutual information of the conditional laws over positive-mass conditioning values.
Finite entropy and mutual-information chain rules: finite entropy and mutual information satisfy their chain rules.
Finite-alphabet Fano inequality: for a finite message and finite observation, .
Finite conditional entropy: conditional entropy is the finite average of conditional entropies over positive-mass conditioning values.
Proof
Fix a finite law and a nonnegative rate pair satisfying each subset information bound strictly whenever that subset has positive total rate. Use a singleton message set for every zero-rate user. Choose a deterministic sequence whose empirical distribution tends to . Independently for each user and message, generate input coordinates with law . The two codebooks are independent.
For a converse code and nonempty , Fano [F6] applied to the decoded subtuple, with the complementary messages supplied as side information, gives The subtuple error is at most the joint error.
For each nonempty define where the denominator averages over the product input laws for users in and a summand is whenever its numerator is zero. For each subset with , choose a threshold with . Decode the unique pair passing all these tests; a subset of zero total rate has no wrong-message candidates and its test is omitted; if no pair or more than one pair passes all the retained tests, output the fixed default pair .
By the chain rule [F5] and the memoryless law [F2], for , The inequality holds because is determined by , so conditioning on cannot increase the first entropy. Interchanging users proves the other individual bound. For , and the same channel-law identity give .
For the true pair and every tested subset, the information-density summands are independent across coordinates, uniformly bounded on their finite positive supports, and their mean average tends to . Their sum variance is , so Chebyshev's inequality makes all tested true tests pass with probability tending to one.
Fix a wrong-message set and condition on the true complementary codewords and output. The candidate codewords indexed by are independent of the output with the product input law used in the denominator of ; hence the likelihood ratio has conditional expectation one. Markov's inequality bounds a false threshold pass by . There are at most candidates of this error type, so makes the union of the three error classes vanish. The ensemble-average error tends to zero, and a deterministic codebook with error no larger than that average exists. A wrong-message set necessarily has positive total rate, since the zero-rate message sets are singletons. If both rates are zero, the unique message pair is always returned with zero error. Scaling any nonnegative pair in the displayed closed region by , with , makes every positive-total-rate subset inequality strict; letting decrease to zero therefore gives all closed faces, including cases where a zero-rate subset has zero information.
Let be uniform on , independent of the messages, and set . Since each input is a function of its own independent message, . Averaging step 2.2 over gives the three stated conditional mutual-information bounds with this finite . Because has a finite alphabet, ; step 1.2 then bounds each rate for , so its normalized Fano remainder vanishes along a reliable sequence. Divide step 1.2 by , let , then take closure.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed., Chapter 15, §§15.3.1–15.3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Abbas El Gamal and Young-Han Kim, Network Information Theory, Lecture Notes 4, Multiple Access Channels (standard reference, not scraped)