Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Physically degraded two-user DM broadcast capacity region

Statement

For the private-message code of Private-message code for a physically degraded DM broadcast channel over the physically degraded channel X→Y1→Y2 of Physically degraded two-receiver discrete memoryless broadcast channel, the capacity region is the closure of the union over finite U and laws PUX inducing U→X→Y1→Y2 of rate pairs R1≤I(X;Y1∣U),R2≤I(U;Y2). Receiver 1 is the stronger receiver and decodes only its own private message in the operational code; the auxiliary U is a coding variable, not an additional message.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Finite alphabets, a physically degraded memoryless broadcast kernel, independent private messages, one no-feedback encoder, two decoders and average joint error tending to zero.

[F1]

Physically degraded two-receiver discrete memoryless broadcast channel: W(y1,y2∣x)=W1(y1∣x)W2(y2∣y1), so X→Y1→Y2.

[F2]

Private-message code for a physically degraded DM broadcast channel: the messages are independent uniform; one encoder sees both messages, while receiver j estimates only Mj.

[F3]

Finite mutual information: finite mutual information is the finite KL sum in nats.

[F4]

Finite conditional mutual information: finite conditional mutual information is the average of the conditional finite mutual informations.

[F5]

Finite conditional mutual information identities and equality: conditional information is nonnegative and the finite entropy-information identities hold.

[F6]

Finite entropy and mutual-information chain rules: finite entropy and information chain rules hold.

[F7]

Finite-alphabet Fano inequality: for a finite message estimated from a finite output, H(M∣Yn)≤ln⁡2+Peln⁡∣M∣.

[F8]

Finite conditional entropy: conditional entropy is the finite average of conditional entropies over positive-mass conditioning values.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2choose

Fix a finite law PUX=PUPX∣U and rates with R2<I(U;Y2) and R1<I(X;Y1∣U). Generate independent IID cloud words un(m2)∼PUn and, conditionally on each cloud, IID satellite words xn(m1,m2)∼∏iPX∣U(⋅∣ui(m2)). Send the satellite indexed by (m1,m2).

1.2F1F2F6F7F8algebra

For a converse code, let Ui:=(M2,Y1i−1). Fano [F7], independence in [F2], and the chain rule give nR1≤I(M1;Y1n∣M2)+ln⁡2+PenR1,nR2≤I(M2;Y2n)+ln⁡2+PenR2. The information terms are at most nln⁡∣Y1∣ and nln⁡∣Y2∣, respectively, so the Fano inequalities bound each rate whenever Pe<1/2 and their normalized remainders vanish along a reliable sequence. Expanding the first information and using the no-feedback encoder and memorylessness gives I(M1;Y1n∣M2)≤∑iI(Xi;Y1i∣Ui).

2.1F1F3F4F5F8step 1.1choose

Receiver 2 outputs the unique cloud passing the test ∑iln⁡[PY2∣U(yi∣ui)/PY2(yi)]>nτ2, with R2<τ2<I(U;Y2), and outputs the fixed default cloud 1 if zero or multiple clouds pass. Receiver 1 outputs the own-message component of the unique pair passing both tests: the cloud density with Y1 exceeds nτ1, and the conditional satellite density ∑iln⁡[PY1∣X,U(yi∣xi,ui)/PY1∣U(yi∣ui)] exceeds nτX. In each test, a summand with zero numerator is −∞; on the codebook support a positive numerator has positive denominator. If zero or multiple pairs pass, receiver 1 outputs the fixed default message 1. Choose thresholds with R2<τ1<I(U;Y1) and R1<τX<I(X;Y1∣U). The chain rule gives I(U;Y1)=I(U;Y2)+I(U;Y1∣Y2) because I(U;Y2∣Y1)=0 by [F1]; the last conditional information is nonnegative by [F5].

2.2F1F5F6step 1.2algebra

For the weak receiver, adding variables to the first argument of mutual information and then using physical degradation gives I(M2;Y2n)≤∑iI(M2,Y1i−1,Y2i−1;Y2i)=∑iI(Ui;Y2i). The equality holds because, conditional on (M2,Y1i−1), the past weak outputs are generated from Y1i−1 independently of the current output.

3.1step 2.1F3algebra

The true cloud and satellite information densities are sums of IID finite-valued terms on their positive supports. Their means are the four mutual informations used in step 2.1; Chebyshev's inequality makes every true threshold pass with probability tending to one.

3.2step 1.1step 2.1algebraalgebra

A false cloud word is independent of Y1n and Y2n; under the corresponding product reference law each cloud likelihood ratio has expectation one, so a threshold nτ1 or nτ2 is passed with probability at most e−nτj. A false satellite in the true cloud is independent conditionally on that cloud and has conditional likelihood-ratio expectation one, so its threshold probability is at most e−nτX. There are at most enR2+o(n) wrong clouds and enR1+o(n) wrong satellites per true cloud. The strict threshold gaps and union bound make both receiver error probabilities tend to zero in ensemble mean.

4.1F2step 3.2choosecases

The random codebook ensemble is finite at each blocklength; since its mean joint error tends to zero, at least one deterministic codebook has error no larger than that mean. If R2=0, one cloud is used and its cloud threshold is omitted; if R1=0, one satellite per cloud is used and its satellite threshold is omitted. The remaining packing bounds above still apply; taking closure gives every nonnegative rate pair in the asserted union.

5.1F1F5step 1.2step 2.2algebra∎

Let Q be uniform on {1,…,n} and independent, and put U=(Q,UQ), X=XQ, Yj=YjQ. The channel factorization [F1] gives U→X→Y1→Y2. Step 1.2 gives R1≤I(X;Y1∣U)+ϵn, and step 2.2 gives R2≤I(UQ;Y2Q∣Q)+ϵn≤I(U;Y2)+ϵn by nonnegative I(Q;Y2). The alphabets of U are finite. Let n→∞ and take closure.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources