How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Kummer pairing is perfect
Statement
Let be a field, let , assume , and assume . Let
have finite quotient, and let be the associated finite Kummer extension (Kummer extensions from adjoining -th roots over a base field containing ). Then the rule
defines a well-defined bilinear pairing
and it is nondegenerate in both variables. In this sense the Kummer pairing is perfect.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field , the integer , the subgroup , the Kummer extension , an automorphism , and an element with chosen -th root .
A Kummer extension is a finite Galois extension generated by -th roots of elements of , with (Kummer extensions from adjoining -th roots over a base field containing ).
For a finite Galois extension, the fixed field of the full Galois group is the base field (Equivalent characterizations of a finite Galois extension).
Proof
Because , the quotient is an -th root of unity, so it lies in . If is another chosen -th root of , then since fixes and hence . If represents the same class in , then choosing gives the same quotient. Thus the pairing is well defined.
Bilinearity is immediate: and for classes represented by roots ,
For nondegeneracy on the Galois side, let . Since is generated over by the chosen -th roots of elements of , some such root satisfies . For the class of , one then has So no nontrivial automorphism lies in the left kernel.
For nondegeneracy on the side, let be nontrivial. Then , for otherwise would lie in . By [F1] and [L1], some satisfies . Hence so no nontrivial class lies in the right kernel.
Steps 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 prove the stated well-defined bilinear pairing and its nondegeneracy in both variables.
Depends on
- Kummer extensions from adjoining $n$-th roots over a base field containing $\mu_n$
- If $\mu_n\subseteq F$ and $\operatorname{char}F\nmid n$, then a degree-$n$ extension is cyclic exactly when it is $F(\alpha)$ with $\alpha^n\in F$ and $x^n-\alpha^n$ irreducible
- Equivalent characterizations of a finite Galois extension
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, v5.10, Remark 5.32 (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Conrad, Kummer Theory, Theorem 5.12 (standard reference, not scraped)