Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lagrange multipliers for a regular vector-valued level-set constraint

Statement

Let U⊆Rm be open, let f:U→R and G:U→Rq be C1, and suppose a is a local maximum or minimum of f subject to G(x)=c. If DG(a) is surjective, then there is a unique λ∈Rq such that Df(a)v=⟨λ,DG(a)v⟩(v∈Rm), or equivalently ∇f(a)=DG(a)Tλ. This is a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition for a constrained extremum.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The maps f,G, the regular constrained point a, and c=G(a).

[L1]

If c is a regular value of a C1 map on an open set, then at every point a of its fibre a vector lies in the tangent space exactly when it is the velocity at zero of a C1 curve through a inside that fibre (Tangent vectors to a regular level set are exactly its curve velocities).

[L4]

For a C1 map the locus where the derivative has rank at least r is open, so the submersion locus is open (Differential rank is lower semicontinuous); a value is regular when every point of its fibre is a submersion point (Regular and critical points, regular and critical values, and level sets).

[L2]

A local extremum is defined by the objective inequality on a neighbourhood, and if a differentiable function restricted to a differentiable curve has a local extremum, then its derivative along the curve is zero (Local and strict local extrema for scalar fields on Euclidean open sets, A constrained local extremum annihilates every velocity of a differentiable parametrization).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L4choose

By [L4] the set W of points of U at which DG is surjective is open, and a∈W; on W every point of every fibre is a submersion point, so c is a regular value of G∣W and a is a local extremum of f subject to G∣W=c. Fix v∈ker⁡DG(a). By [L1] applied to G∣W, choose a level-set curve γ with γ(0)=a and γ′(0)=v inside G∣W−1(c)⊆G−1(c). The constrained local extremum condition in [L2] makes f∘γ locally extremal at 0.

2.1step 1.1L2

By [L2], Df(a)v=0. Since v was arbitrary, the functional Df(a) vanishes on ker⁡DG(a).

3.1step 2.1L3

Apply [L3] to the surjection DG(a). It gives a unique λ with Df(a)v=⟨λ,DG(a)v⟩ for all v, and the gradient representation turns this equality of functionals into ∇f(a)=DG(a)Tλ.

4.1step 3.1∎

The argument derives the multiplier equation from a constrained extremum and makes no converse assertion, as claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources