Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A linear functional annihilating the kernel of a surjection is a unique transpose multiple

Statement

Let A:RmRn be a surjective linear map, with m,n1, and let :RmR be linear. If vanishes on kerA, then there is a unique λRn such that (v)=λ,Avfor every vRm. Equivalently, the row vector of is ATλ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The surjective linear map A and the linear functional vanishing on kerA.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For each standard basis vector ej, choose wjRm with Awj=ej, and define λj=(wj). These are finitely many choices.

givenL1choose
2.1

For vRm, put w=j<n(Av)jwj. Then Aw=Av by [L1] and linearity, so vwkerA and (v)=(w)=j<n(Av)jλj=λ,Av.

step 1.1L1L2algebra
3.1

If both λ and μ work, surjectivity gives v with Av=λμ; then 0=λμ,Av=λμ22, so λ=μ. This proves existence and uniqueness.

step 2.1L1L2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources