How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Lah numbers count ordered-block set partitions and expand the rising factorial in the falling basis
Statement
Let , let for , and for define
Then for every ,
Moreover, counts partitions of into exactly nonempty blocks, each equipped with a linear order.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rising and falling factorials of The rising factorial and The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in .
Proof
Fix and . Take a permutation of , written as a word of length , and choose of the gaps between consecutive letters. Cutting the word at those gaps produces an ordered list of nonempty ordered blocks. This gives ordered lists of ordered blocks.
Forgetting the left-to-right order of the blocks divides by , because every unordered family of internally ordered blocks has exactly linear orders of its blocks. Hence counts partitions of into nonempty linearly ordered blocks.
For , consider distinguishable boxes arranged from left to right. Building an ordered list inside each box by inserting the elements one after another gives possibilities. Grouping the outcomes by the number of nonempty boxes, one first chooses the underlying partition of into internally ordered blocks, counted by from step 2.1, and then chooses the occupied boxes in order, which gives possibilities. Summing over yields .
Steps 2.1 and 3.1 prove the counting interpretation and the falling-factorial expansion on natural arguments, together with the defining value .
Depends on
Used by
- The Lah number L(4,2) Example
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kenneth P. Bogart, Combinatorics Through Guided Discovery, §3.1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)