How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Deleting a leaf from each of two forbidden graphs preserves virality
Statement
Let be a finite family of finite graphs, and let . For , let be a leaf of , and write . If
and
are both viral, then is viral.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite family of finite graphs, members , and leaves for .
The Nguyen-Scott-Seymour leaf-deletion theorem states exactly that, under these hypotheses, if the two modified families and are viral, then is viral.
Proof
Form the two modified families and by deleting the chosen leaves from and . The hypothesis says that both families are viral.
Applying [F1] to the data of step 1.1 gives that is viral.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. IV. New graphs with the Erdős-Hajnal property, Theorem 7.8 (standard reference, not scraped)