Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Deleting a leaf from each of two forbidden graphs preserves virality

Statement

Let F be a finite family of finite graphs, and let H1,H2F. For i=1,2, let vi be a leaf of Hi, and write Hi:=Hi{vi}. If

F1:={H1}(F{H1})

and

F2:={H2}(F{H2})

are both viral, then F is viral.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite family F of finite graphs, members H1,H2F, and leaves viV(Hi) for i=1,2.

[F1]

The Nguyen-Scott-Seymour leaf-deletion theorem states exactly that, under these hypotheses, if the two modified families F1 and F2 are viral, then F is viral.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Form the two modified families F1 and F2 by deleting the chosen leaves from H1 and H2. The hypothesis says that both families are viral.

given
2.1

Applying [F1] to the data of step 1.1 gives that F is viral.

step 1.1F1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources