Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every least-squares solution has the form A+b+(IA+A)z, and the same affine family specializes to exact solutions when bimA

Statement

Let AMm×n(F) and bFm. A vector x is a least-squares solution of Ax=b if and only if

x=A+b+(IA+A)z

for some zFn. If bimA, then the same family is exactly the full solution set of Ax=b.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L2] and [L3], A+A is the orthogonal projection onto (kerA). Therefore IA+A is the orthogonal projection onto kerA. In particular, its image is kerA and it vanishes on (kerA).

L2L3algebra
2.1

By [L1], every least-squares minimiser has the form A+b+u with ukerA. Since step 1.1 says every ukerA equals (IA+A)z for some z, every least-squares minimiser has the stated form.

L1step 1.1
2.2

Conversely, if x=A+b+(IA+A)z, then step 1.1 gives (IA+A)zkerA. Hence x differs from the least-squares minimiser A+b by a kernel vector, so [L1] implies that x is again a least-squares minimiser.

L1step 1.1algebra
3.1

If bimA, then the least-squares residual can be 0. Thus the least-squares minimisers are exactly the exact solutions of Ax=b, and steps 2.1-2.1 identify that exact solution set with the same affine family.

L1step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove the if-and-only-if description, and step 3.1 gives the consistent specialisation.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources