How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a linear map between finite-dimensional inner-product spaces, minimises if and only if , equivalently ; minimisers exist and any two differ by an element of
Statement
Let be a linear map between finite-dimensional inner product spaces and let . A vector minimises if and only if
equivalently . Minimisers exist, and if is one minimiser, then the full set of minimisers is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional map and .
Orthogonal projection onto a finite-dimensional subspace is its unique nearest point (The orthogonal projection is the unique nearest point in the subspace).
The adjoint is defined by (The adjoint is characterised by ).
The identity holds in finite dimension ( and in finite dimension).
Proof
The subspace has the unique nearest point to by [L1]. Choose with . Thus a minimiser exists.
A vector is a minimiser exactly when , which by orthogonal projection is exactly when . By [L3], this is exactly .
Linearity turns the last equation into , equivalently .
If and are minimisers, uniqueness of the nearest image point gives , so . Conversely, adding any element of leaves the image and residual unchanged. Hence the minimisers are exactly .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 22 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sergei Treil, Linear Algebra Done Wrong, §5.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)