How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Left duality is a contravariant antimonoidal functor
Statement
After choosing a left dual for each object , the assignment and defines a contravariant functor . Moreover, for all objects , the object is a left dual of , so there is a unique compatible isomorphism
and likewise .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Chosen left duals for all objects of a left rigid monoidal category.
The dual of a morphism is defined by the transpose formula in The dual of a morphism.
A fixed object has at most one left dual up to unique compatible isomorphism (Duals are unique up to a unique compatible isomorphism).
The tensor unit is a left dual of itself (The unit is self-dual).
Proof
Expanding the definition from [L1] with and then straightening the resulting coevaluation-evaluation pair by the zig-zag identities shows .
The usual tensoring of the chosen dual pairs gives evaluation and coevaluation maps exhibiting as a left dual of . Since is the chosen left dual of the same object, [L3] gives a unique compatible isomorphism
For morphisms , the defining composite for contains the block between one coevaluation and one evaluation. Splitting that block into followed by yields exactly the composite for , so . Hence is contravariant.
By [L4], the tensor unit is itself a left dual of . Applying [L3] to the chosen left dual and this canonical one gives a unique compatible isomorphism . Together with step 1.2, this supplies the unit comparison, so is antimonoidal.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michael Muger, Tensor Categories: A Selective Guided Tour, Section 1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Section 2.10 (standard reference, not scraped)