Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The little group method for a semidirect product with abelian kernel

Statement

Let G=A⋊H be a finite internal semidirect product with A normal and abelian, so that G=AH and A∩H={1} (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup). For θ∈A^=Hom⁡(A,C×) put Hθ={h∈H:θ(h−1ah)=θ(a) for all a∈A},Iθ=A⋊Hθ. Then θ~(ah):=θ(a) is a linear character of Iθ extending θ, and up to isomorphism the irreducible complex representations of G are exactly Ind⁡IθG(θ~⊗Infl⁡HθIθσ),θ one representative per H-orbit in A^,σ∈Irr⁡(Hθ), with degrees [H:Hθ]dim⁡σ. In this split case the Clifford obstruction class vanishes, whereas for a nonsplit invariant type the projective correspondence supplies the correction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G together with a normal abelian subgroup A and a subgroup H with G=AH and A∩H={1}, and a linear character θ:A→C×.

[F1]

G is the internal semidirect product of A by H exactly when A⊴G, G=AH and A∩H={1}. (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup).

[F2]
[F3]

Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field has degree 1; hence the irreducible complex characters of A are exactly the homomorphisms A→C×. (Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional).

[F4]

gθ(a)=θ(g−1ag) defines the conjugation action and IG(θ)={g∈G:gθ=θ} is the inertia group, a subgroup with N≤IG(θ)≤G. (Inertia group and characters lying above a normal type).

[F5]

Induction gives a bijection Irr⁡(IG(θ)∣θ)→Irr⁡(G∣θ), whose inverse takes the θ-isotypical component; conjugate normal types give the same target set, and the sets Irr⁡(G∣θ) over distinct G-orbits partition Irr⁡(G). (Clifford correspondence).

[F6]

If a representation affording θ has a fixed extension S~ to IG(θ), then Irr⁡(IG(θ)/N)→Irr⁡(IG(θ)∣θ), η↦χS~Inf⁡η, is a bijection, and the induced G-character has ramification index η(1) over θ. (Gallagher correspondence for an extendible type).

[F7]

If N⊴G and ρ is a representation with N⊆ker⁡ρ, then ρ factors through a representation ρ‾ of G/N with ρ=ρ‾∘π, and irreducibility is the same for ρ and ρ‾. (A representation with kernel containing a normal subgroup factors through the quotient, and irreducibility is unchanged by inflation).

[F8]

For finite-dimensional complex representations one has χV⊗W(g)=χV(g)χW(g). (Characters add on direct sums, multiply on tensor products, and conjugate on duals).

[F9]

The dimension of an induced representation is dim⁡kInd⁡HGW=[G:H]dim⁡kW. (The dimension of an induced finite-dimensional representation is [G:H]dim⁡W).

[F10]

An invariant irreducible representation extends to its inertia group if and only if its Clifford obstruction class is zero. (An invariant irreducible representation extends to its inertia group exactly when the Clifford obstruction vanishes).

[F11]

For a nonsplit invariant type the irreducible I-modules over the type are parametrized by irreducible projective representations of the quotient with factor set α−1, tensored with the type; when α is trivializable this reduces to Gallagher's correspondence. (The projective Clifford correspondence for an invariant irreducible representation).

[A1]

Consequently, if I≤G and π:I→I/A is the quotient map, inflation along I/A≅Hθ carries the irreducible characters of Hθ bijectively onto the irreducible characters of Iθ that are trivial on A, since A is contained in the kernel of precisely those representations.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Every element of G has a unique expression ah with a∈A, h∈H: existence is G=AH by [F1], and if ah=a′h′ then h′h−1=(a′)−1a∈A∩H={1}, so h=h′ and a=a′. Also Hθ={h∈H:hθ=θ} is the stabilizer in H of θ under the action of [F4], hence a subgroup of H; and A≤IG(θ), because A is abelian and therefore aθ(b)=θ(a−1ba)=θ(b) for all a,b∈A.

F1F4given
2.1

The inertia group is Iθ=IG(θ)=A⋊Hθ: an element g=ah satisfies gθ=hθ because A acts trivially, so g∈IG(θ) if and only if h∈Hθ; thus IG(θ)=AHθ={ah:a∈A, h∈Hθ}, which is a subgroup of G by steps 1.1 and the normality of A in G. Moreover the assignment hHθ↦hIθ is a bijection H/Hθ→G/Iθ, since Iθ∩H=Hθ and G=IθH; hence [G:Iθ]=[H:Hθ].

F1step 1.1given
3.1

The formula θ~(ah):=θ(a) defines a linear character of Iθ with θ~∣A=θ: it is well defined by the uniqueness in step 1.1, takes values in C×, and θ~(1)=1. For a,b∈A and h,k∈Hθ one has (ah)(bk)=a(hbh−1)(hk) with hbh−1∈A, so θ~((ah)(bk))=θ(a)θ(hbh−1)=θ(a)θ(b)=θ~(ah)θ~(bk), using h∈Hθ; and θ~(a⋅1)=θ(a) for a∈A, so θ~ extends θ.

step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra
4.1

Gallagher's correspondence applies to the extension θ~ of θ to Iθ: by [F6] the map η↦χθ~Inf⁡η is a bijection from Irr⁡(Iθ/A) onto Irr⁡(Iθ∣θ). The quotient Iθ/A is isomorphic to Hθ via ah↦h, and by [F7] and [A1] inflation identifies Irr⁡(Hθ) with Irr⁡(Iθ/A) through the irreducible representations of Iθ having A in their kernel; hence the irreducible characters of Iθ lying over θ are exactly the characters of the representations θ~⊗Infl⁡HθIθσ with σ∈Irr⁡(Hθ), since θ~ is one-dimensional and χθ~⊗Infl⁡σ=θ~⋅(Infl⁡χσ) by [F8].

F6F7F8A1step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

Clifford induction then gives the parametrization: by [F5] induction is a bijection Irr⁡(Iθ∣θ)→Irr⁡(G∣θ), so composing with step 4.1, the assignment σ↦Ind⁡IθG(θ~⊗Infl⁡σ) is a bijection from Irr⁡(Hθ) onto Irr⁡(G∣θ), and every representation in its image is irreducible.

F5step 4.1
5.2

The degrees are [H:Hθ]dim⁡σ: the tensor product θ~⊗Infl⁡σ has dimension dim⁡σ because θ~ is one-dimensional, so [F9] with G, Iθ and this module gives dim⁡Ind⁡IθG(θ~⊗Infl⁡σ)=[G:Iθ]dim⁡σ=[H:Hθ]dim⁡σ by step 2.1; the ramification index over θ is instead dim⁡σ by [F6].

F6F9step 2.1step 4.1
5.3

In this split situation the Clifford obstruction vanishes and no projective correction is needed: θ~ is a genuine extension of θ to Iθ by step 3.1, so the obstruction class of θ is zero by [F10]; correspondingly, in the general correspondence of [F11] the factor set can be taken to be 1 and the irreducible projective representations of Iθ/A are the ordinary irreducible representations of Hθ, so the assignment of step 4.1 is exactly Gallagher's correspondence and the theorem above is its orbit-parametrized form. For a nonsplit invariant type the obstruction can be nonzero; when it is, [F11] replaces the ordinary quotient representations by the irreducible projective representations attached to the class. A nonsplit extension by itself does not force a nonzero obstruction (the trivial type always extends).

F10F11step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1
6.1

The list is exhaustive and repetition-free over the orbits: the irreducible characters of A are exactly the homomorphisms A→C×, because C is a splitting field for the finite group A by [F2] and every irreducible of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional by [F3]; since A acts trivially on A^, the G-orbits on these characters are exactly the H-orbits, and by [F5] the sets Irr⁡(G∣θ) depend only on the orbit of θ and partition Irr⁡(G). Taking one θ per H-orbit therefore lists every irreducible G-representation exactly once through step 5.1.

F2F3F5step 5.1
6.2

The degenerate cases are included: if Hθ=H then Iθ=G, induction is the identity, and the list is {θ~⊗Infl⁡σ:σ∈Irr⁡(H)} with degrees dim⁡σ; if Hθ=1 then Iθ=A and the list reduces to the single representation Ind⁡AGθ of degree [H:1]=dim⁡Ind⁡AGθ; if A=1 then G=H, the dual A^ is trivial, Hθ=H, and the statement is the tautology Irr⁡(H)=Irr⁡(H) with degrees dim⁡σ.

F3step 2.1step 5.1step 5.2
7.1

Steps 3.1, 5.1, 6.1, 5.2 and 6.2 prove the assertion: θ~(ah)=θ(a) is a linear character of Iθ=A⋊Hθ extending θ, and the representations Ind⁡IθG(θ~⊗Infl⁡σ), for one θ from each H-orbit in A^ and σ∈Irr⁡(Hθ), are exactly the irreducible complex representations of G up to isomorphism, with the stated degrees; step 5.3 records that the obstruction vanishes in this split case and that the projective correspondence is the correction required when it does not.

step 3.1step 5.1step 6.1step 5.2step 5.3step 6.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources