How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The little group method for a semidirect product with abelian kernel
Statement
Let be a finite internal semidirect product with normal and abelian, so that and (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup). For put Then is a linear character of extending , and up to isomorphism the irreducible complex representations of are exactly with degrees . In this split case the Clifford obstruction class vanishes, whereas for a nonsplit invariant type the projective correspondence supplies the correction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group together with a normal abelian subgroup and a subgroup with and , and a linear character .
is the internal semidirect product of by exactly when , and . (An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup).
is a splitting field for every finite group. (A cyclotomic field splits a finite group, The complex numbers are algebraically closed).
Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field has degree ; hence the irreducible complex characters of are exactly the homomorphisms . (Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional).
defines the conjugation action and is the inertia group, a subgroup with . (Inertia group and characters lying above a normal type).
Induction gives a bijection , whose inverse takes the -isotypical component; conjugate normal types give the same target set, and the sets over distinct -orbits partition . (Clifford correspondence).
If a representation affording has a fixed extension to , then , , is a bijection, and the induced -character has ramification index over . (Gallagher correspondence for an extendible type).
If and is a representation with , then factors through a representation of with , and irreducibility is the same for and . (A representation with kernel containing a normal subgroup factors through the quotient, and irreducibility is unchanged by inflation).
For finite-dimensional complex representations one has . (Characters add on direct sums, multiply on tensor products, and conjugate on duals).
The dimension of an induced representation is . (The dimension of an induced finite-dimensional representation is ).
An invariant irreducible representation extends to its inertia group if and only if its Clifford obstruction class is zero. (An invariant irreducible representation extends to its inertia group exactly when the Clifford obstruction vanishes).
For a nonsplit invariant type the irreducible -modules over the type are parametrized by irreducible projective representations of the quotient with factor set , tensored with the type; when is trivializable this reduces to Gallagher's correspondence. (The projective Clifford correspondence for an invariant irreducible representation).
Consequently, if and is the quotient map, inflation along carries the irreducible characters of bijectively onto the irreducible characters of that are trivial on , since is contained in the kernel of precisely those representations.
Proof
Every element of has a unique expression with , : existence is by [F1], and if then , so and . Also is the stabilizer in of under the action of [F4], hence a subgroup of ; and , because is abelian and therefore for all .
The inertia group is : an element satisfies because acts trivially, so if and only if ; thus , which is a subgroup of by steps 1.1 and the normality of in . Moreover the assignment is a bijection , since and ; hence .
The formula defines a linear character of with : it is well defined by the uniqueness in step 1.1, takes values in , and . For and one has with , so , using ; and for , so extends .
Gallagher's correspondence applies to the extension of to : by [F6] the map is a bijection from onto . The quotient is isomorphic to via , and by [F7] and [A1] inflation identifies with through the irreducible representations of having in their kernel; hence the irreducible characters of lying over are exactly the characters of the representations with , since is one-dimensional and by [F8].
Clifford induction then gives the parametrization: by [F5] induction is a bijection , so composing with step 4.1, the assignment is a bijection from onto , and every representation in its image is irreducible.
The degrees are : the tensor product has dimension because is one-dimensional, so [F9] with , and this module gives by step 2.1; the ramification index over is instead by [F6].
In this split situation the Clifford obstruction vanishes and no projective correction is needed: is a genuine extension of to by step 3.1, so the obstruction class of is zero by [F10]; correspondingly, in the general correspondence of [F11] the factor set can be taken to be and the irreducible projective representations of are the ordinary irreducible representations of , so the assignment of step 4.1 is exactly Gallagher's correspondence and the theorem above is its orbit-parametrized form. For a nonsplit invariant type the obstruction can be nonzero; when it is, [F11] replaces the ordinary quotient representations by the irreducible projective representations attached to the class. A nonsplit extension by itself does not force a nonzero obstruction (the trivial type always extends).
The list is exhaustive and repetition-free over the orbits: the irreducible characters of are exactly the homomorphisms , because is a splitting field for the finite group by [F2] and every irreducible of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional by [F3]; since acts trivially on , the -orbits on these characters are exactly the -orbits, and by [F5] the sets depend only on the orbit of and partition . Taking one per -orbit therefore lists every irreducible -representation exactly once through step 5.1.
The degenerate cases are included: if then , induction is the identity, and the list is with degrees ; if then and the list reduces to the single representation of degree ; if then , the dual is trivial, , and the statement is the tautology with degrees .
Steps 3.1, 5.1, 6.1, 5.2 and 6.2 prove the assertion: is a linear character of extending , and the representations , for one from each -orbit in and , are exactly the irreducible complex representations of up to isomorphism, with the stated degrees; step 5.3 records that the obstruction vanishes in this split case and that the projective correspondence is the correction required when it does not.
Depends on
- The projective Clifford correspondence for an invariant irreducible representation
- An invariant irreducible representation extends to its inertia group exactly when the Clifford obstruction vanishes
- Clifford correspondence
- Gallagher correspondence for an extendible type
- Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional
- An internal semidirect product and a complement to a normal subgroup
- Inertia group and characters lying above a normal type
- A cyclotomic field splits a finite group
- The complex numbers are algebraically closed
- A representation with kernel containing a normal subgroup factors through the quotient, and irreducibility is unchanged by inflation
- Characters add on direct sums, multiply on tensor products, and conjugate on duals
- The dimension of an induced finite-dimensional representation is $[G:H]\dim W$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory — Propositions (4.2.4), (4.2.6) and Remark (4.2.7), printed pp. 56–57 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Britta Späth, Reduction theorems for some global-local conjectures — Theorem 1.3 (Gallagher) and Theorem 1.2 (Clifford), printed pp. 2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)